1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
liberstina [14]
3 years ago
8

Compare the reasoning behind Lawson and Schapiro’s arguments. Which do you think was the most compelling? Why?

Social Studies
1 answer:
Ronch [10]3 years ago
3 0
I can not answer this if I haven’t seen there arguments.
You might be interested in
Which supreme court case held that new evidence of innocence is no reason to order a new state trial when constitutional grounds
lidiya [134]
The judicial branch look closely and u can tell
6 0
4 years ago
Where and when did the Neolithic Revolution occur
goblinko [34]
When- latest period of the stone age which was right after the ice age
10000 B.C. to 4000 B.C.
Where- Mesopotamia in what is now modern Iraq
6 0
3 years ago
What is the biggest part of the Declaration of Independence?
Korolek [52]
<span>All men (?) are created equal.

or it can be </span><span>complaints about King George III</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Connie is a concrete operational thinker whereas Forrest is a formal operational thinker. Which of the following statements is m
Troyanec [42]

Answer:

Forrest is better than Connie in abstract reasoning.

Explanation:

Formal operational thinker, is a term that describes an individual, speifically those from age 12 into adulthood.

Formal operational thinker are characterized by their ability to reason in an abstract manner or concept. It is often associated with ability to formulate ideas or hypothesis and test them to reach a definite conclusion.

On the other hand, Concrete Operational thinker are characterized by people often kids of age seven or eight, whereby they start to perform mental operations in a way that involves physical world rather than abstract concept.

For example, a child knows a primary 1 mathematics teacher who is tough, another primary 2 mathematics teacher, who is also tough, and the same is true for a primary 3 mathematics teacher. The child may conclude that primary mathematics are tough.

Hence, in this case, the right answer is: Forrest is better than Connie in abstract reasoning.

3 0
3 years ago
Piaget development theory principles​
MrMuchimi

Answer: assimilation, accommodation and equilibration

Explanation:

Three Main Principles of Piaget's Theory Piaget's theory of cognitive development was based on three main principles which are assimilation, accommodation and equilibration First it is important to define the term 'schema'.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • According to your textbook, when using emotional appeal in a persuasive speech, you should
    11·1 answer
  • What does respecting people’s privacy mean?
    10·2 answers
  • One way the genetic contribution to personality can be explored is by studying the temperaments of human infants and children.
    14·1 answer
  • What term describes what an actor breaks when he addresses the audience directly from stage, like in Hamlet’s “to be or not to b
    8·1 answer
  • Based on the way natural resources shape the industries of a region where would you mostly likely find a citrus farm?
    8·1 answer
  • What was the major cause of the start of the Russian Revolution
    9·1 answer
  • Can somebody help me
    14·2 answers
  • 1 - O conto tradicional é uma narrativa breve , em prosa, moralista e
    12·1 answer
  • What is an religious group
    12·2 answers
  • The chart below represents the steps in the process of a bill becoming a law. Use the chart to answer the following question.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!