Answer:
a. Asarta Inc. could pay the fishermen $8,500 and keep polluting
Explanation:
The fishermen sell the fish for $8,000 a year at local market.
Due to pollution emitted by company into stream, their catch is dwindling and also their income.
The company benefits from usage of stream to the tune of $4,000 a year. In such scenario, if company compensates the fishermen for any amount between $8,000 and $40,000 then, in that case, optimal solution to the problem can be achieved in absence of any other transaction cost as per the Coase Theorem.
Therefore, The Asarta Inc. could pay the fishermen $8,500 and keep polluting.
P(t) = (0.83)t^(5/4)
<span>2096 - 2015 = 81 </span>
<span>81 ^ (5/4) = 243 </span>
<span>243 × 0.83 = 201.69 </span>
<span>Population in 2096 expected to be 202 million.</span>
Answer:
The journal entry for J. Laney. to record this transaction is:
Legal Expenses $13,920 (debit)
Common Stock $2,900 (credit)
Share Premium $11,020 (credit)
Explanation:
The Common Stocks are carried at par value of $1. This means that any price paid in excess of the par value is accounted for in the Share Premium Account.
The Common stocks issued are measured at the price required to settle the legal expenses and are paid in excess of par value of $1.
Share Premium = ($4.80 - $1.00) × 2900 shares
= $3.80 × 2,900
= $11,020
