Answer: $116.026
Explanation:
Given the following ;
Yearly hazard insurance = $350
Keisha is the buyer and the closing date of transaction is September 1 of the year.
January 1 till September 1 = 244days
Now Keisha will have to credit John from September 2 till December 31st of that year
Therefore,
September 2 till December 31 = 365 - 244 = 121 days
Daily hazard insurance = $350 ÷ 365 = $0.9589
Keisha's share = $0.9589 × 121 = $116.026
Answer:
product
Explanation:
The product is an item that the company offer to its customer for buying the product. It is not only the goods that to be kept physically but it also consist of the services and ideas so that it become differentiate with the competitor. The product can be differentiate in terms of cost, quality, quantity, presentable form via having the innovative ideas
So, the 2nd last option is correct
Answer:
The legislature's action is an example of: Revoking common law by new statutory law
Explanation:
First of all, we need to understand what is the difference between a common-law and statutory law.
<u>Common-law: </u>This is based on decisions made previously at court, they have judicial precedent, so when there are similar cases the judges base their decision on these precedents.
<u>Statutory law:</u> This is a formal type of law, given it passed the house of parliament or Congress. The statutory laws are written and they regulate the behavior of citizens. There are many examples of statutory laws: tax laws, traffic regulations, etc.
According to the definitions above, the statutory law is stronger than a common law because the statutory law can modify the common law, just as in the provided example:<em> The legislature, following the court ruling, passes a statute saying hair color is not covered by anti-discrimination laws.</em>
Despite the common law is based on prior decisions taken at court (precedents), these are not approved by the parliament or congress, unlike the statutory law.
The true statement about this natural monopoly is that It is more efficient on the cost side for one producer to exist in this market rather than a large number of producers.
- Also, it is a true statement that natural monopolies can earn positive profit in the long run without the government regulation.
<h3>What is a
natural monopolies?</h3>
This refers to the type of monopoly that exists in a particular market if a single firm can serve that market at lower cost than any combination of two or more firms.
It mostly occurs when when the most efficient number of firms in the industry is one. Also, a natural monopoly will ideally have very high fixed costs implying that it is impractical to have multiple firms producing the good.
A very good example of a natural monopoly is the case of tap water.
Hence, the true statement about this natural monopoly is that It is more efficient on the cost side for one producer to exist in this market rather than a large number of producers and it is a true statement that natural monopolies can earn positive profit in the long run without the government regulation.
Therefore, the answers are Option B and True.
Read more about natural monopoly
brainly.com/question/13113415
#SPJ1
<span>Planning (also called forethought) is the process of thinking about and organizing the activities required to achieve a desired goal. It involves the creation and maintenance of a plan, such as psychological aspects that require conceptual skills.</span>
