New Zealand and Australia as colonies were differnet from India because they C. attracted large numbers of settlers from Great Britain.
<h3>How were New Zealand and Austrailia different from India?</h3>
New Zealand and Austrialia were able to attract a lot of British people to stay in them which made them more loyal to the British.
India on the other hand, only provided resources to the British and never really saw a mass migration by British people.
Find out more on the Austrialia colony at brainly.com/question/4196080.
#SPJ1
For the answer to the question above asking w<span>hich three of these inventions helped trigger the agricultural revolution in Britain?
the question is incomplete however the techniques are </span>the plow irrigation, and faster methods of farming and the crop rotation techniques<span>
</span>
Answer:
the British preferred to use local institutions to control subject populations.
Explanation:
British colonialism was established differently in places that had already established their own institutions, such as African countries. Although these countries already had institutions before the arrival of the English, it was necessary that the British empire dominate these institutions, or to give them up and form new institutions. However, the British empire understood that dominating existing institutions would be something cheaper and more advantageous and that it would establish an efficient dominance, so it was done, that is, unlike other European nations, England decided to use local institutions to control populations subdued.
Answer:
hey u blocked me pliz unblock me yer
Explanation:
