<span>The Whigs and Tories were prominent parties of the time. Some parties, including the Whigs, transitioned into Liberal, Conservative and Labour parties during the 1800s at lest i think sorry if i'm worng :) hope it helps </span>
Answer:
the Council of Trent responded emphatically to the issues at hand and enacted the formal Roman Catholic reply to the doctrinal challenges of the Protestants.
Answer:
Explanation:
Sabía de todo y se consideraba el mejor en todo, por eso desarrolló una concepción centralizadora del poder, eficaz en los primeros años, pero que cuando amplió su radio de acción fue uno de sus puntos débiles
La muestra repasa, a través de libros, planos originales, documentos, testimonios y un amplio material interactivo, la conformación de su conciencia de la estrategia, escenificada también con uniformes, armas y cuadros de sus batallas.
Destaca una maqueta que él mando construir para que su genial toma del puente de Arcole, en Italia, fuera enseñada en las escuelas, símbolo de su ascenso con solo 26 años, una meteórica carrera castrense que pronto supo tornar en conquista política.
<u>Question 1. </u>
Yes, Justice Murphy conceded that there were some people within the United States who acted with disloyalty toward the United States. In this case, the issue had to do with Japanese Americans on the West Coast. But in his Dissenting Opinion, Justin Murphy argued that the fact of disloyalty by some should not mean that all Americans of Japanese ancestry be subjected to restriction of their rights and evacuation orders. As he wrote, "Under our system of law individual guilt is the sole basis for deprivation of rights." Treating all Japanese Americans as if they were guilty of disloyalty to the United States was a violation of their constitutional rights and was a "legalization of racism," as Justice Murphy put it. All citizens of the United States must be treated "at all times as the heirs of the American experiment and as entitled to all the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution."
<u>Question 2.</u>
I do agree with the Minority Opinion that racial prejudice played a role in the US government's treatment of Japanese Americans. The military was allowed to act outside of proper constitutional limits and infringed on the rights of citizens. There was definitely prejudice, which means pre-judging or judging in advance. The authorities were able to force any and all persons of Japanese ancestry into internment camps, without presenting any evidence that they as individuals had, in fact, done anything to warrant such action against them. It had been generic, stereotyped suspicion of anyone of Japanese heritage that prompted the government to restrict the civil liberties of Japanese Americans. President Roosevelt's Executive Order 9066 (February 1942), which allowed the Secretary of War to designate certain areas as military zones, set the stage for the mass relocation of Japanese-ancestry persons to internment camps. By June of 1942, over 100,000 Japanese Americans were sent to such internment camps. That was a rush to judgement against thousands of persons without due process of law, to which they were entitled under the US Constitution.
<span>The parliament of Vienna was assembled within 1815 through the four European authorities that had conquered Napoleon. The primary intent was to institute a new equilibrium of control under Europe which could limit hegemony in Europe, such as the Napoleonic domain, and keep the harmony among the majestic authority. The secondary intent was to stop administrative violence, such as the French metamorphosis / The French Revolutionary war.</span>
