1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gavmur [86]
3 years ago
5

How did the land act of 1820 change regulations regarding western settlement?

History
2 answers:
kiruha [24]3 years ago
4 0
How the Land Act of 1820 made changes to the rules about western settlement is that, it decreased the per acre price but ended in purchases in credit. This act has been enacted on the year 1820 by the United States federal law wherein the lowered payments are paid in an installment basis.
lisov135 [29]3 years ago
3 0
The Land Act of 1820 established the ban on purchasing any of the United States' public domains in an installment or credit form of payment over four years. It actually just lowered the prices per acre but ended the credit or installment purchases.
You might be interested in
What is the authors main purpose in writing this article?Cite evidence from the text in your response.DUCK & COVER: SCHOOL D
Tamiku [17]

Answer:

To explain that the school drills were a (clumsy) attempt to channel the growing insecurity and fear among people in the US. They pretended that an atomic attack could be handled in the same way as a fire or an accident,

Explanation:

The DUCK&COVER school drills were part of a  Federal Civil Defense Administration (FCDA) program (early 50s) that was aiming to educate the public about what ordinary people could do to protect themselves. Many people were intelligent enough to realise that ducking under your table wouldn´t save you from nuclear radiation,

Dr. Strangelove by Kubrick is an interesting movie about the Cold War

7 0
2 years ago
summarize the characteristics of totalitarianism. Use at least two examples from the lesson. Write your response in one to
Rama09 [41]

Well, I don't know your lesson, but hitler and stalin are some examples.

3 0
3 years ago
Select all that apply. Advantages to the United States brought about by corporations included:
natulia [17]
In order to help please provide a picture ... 

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What decision did the Supreme Court reach in Dred Scott v. Sandford?
loris [4]

Answer:

There have been many decisions in the history of the US Supreme Court that are hard to call democratic. In the British North American colonies, and then in the USA, the legal foundations of the institution of slavery were created. The English legal system ruled out slavery, but gradually in the local laws of the colonies, and later in the Constitution of the United States and in the case-law of the Supreme Court of the United States, the grounds were formulated on which slaves were considered not to be human subjects, but property. This practice has led to the fact that, shortly before the Civil War, a racist attitude was legalized not only towards slaves, but also to the entire black population of the United States, as is clearly seen in the case of Dread Scott v. Sandford.

Dread Scott was a slave whose owner John Emerson took him from Missouri, the state where slavery was allowed, to Illinois, where slavery was prohibited. A few years later, Scott returned to Missouri with Emerson. Scott believed that since he lived in a free state, he should no longer be considered a slave.

Emerson died in 1843, and three years later, Scott sued Emerson's widow, demanding his freedom. In 1850, he won the case in one of the Missouri courts, but in 1852, the state supreme court overturned the lower court. Meanwhile, Ms. Emerson remarried, and Scott became the legal property of her brother John Sanford. Scott sued Sanford to regain his freedom. The case was investigated in one of the federal courts, which in 1854 ruled against Sanford.

When this case was referred to the Supreme Court, its members decided that Scott did not become free by virtue of his living in a free state and that, being a black man, he is not a citizen and, therefore, has no right to file a lawsuit with a court in force according to the norms of general and statutory law. This decision was widely criticized and contributed to the election of Abraham Lincoln as president.

The judgment in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case was declared unconstitutional by the thirteenth constitutional amendment, which abolished slavery in 1865, and the fourteenth amendment, which granted citizenship to former slaves in 1868.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are the three characteristics the<br> myth of the West developed?
krok68 [10]

Answer:

the answer would be B

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What percentage of enslaved Africans that traveled to the West actually came to North America? fewer than 5% more than 20% fewer
    6·1 answer
  • When did Germany invade Poland in World War 2.
    8·2 answers
  • What was the relationship between cuba and the soviet union in 1962?
    12·1 answer
  • What was one effect of the popularity of suburbia in the1950s?
    5·2 answers
  • I WILL GIVE YOU BRAINLIEST
    12·1 answer
  • Old lights and new lights preachers both followed protestantism
    12·2 answers
  • To which group did the man with the gun likely belong
    10·2 answers
  • Which BEST describes the social and political philosophy of the Underground Railroad “conductor” Harriet Tubman?
    13·2 answers
  • NEED HELP ASAP!!! WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
    6·1 answer
  • Ello peps don't answer this or ur notifications u prob explode anyway whats 2x3 UwU
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!