Why did union forces want to take control of mississippi river and confederacy in two?

2 answers:

7 0

The Union Army took a series of military actions during the Civil War in which their troops took control of the Mississippi River. Mississippi was the main north-south avenue of transport. In July 1863, the western part of the Confederate states was split from the states east of the Mississippi River. Plan of the Union Army generals was to defeat the Confederacy through blockade of ports and control of rivers. Answer: Union forces took control of Mississippi River because they wanted to cut off the eastern part of Confederacy and to control the supply lines.

masha68 [24]2 years ago

4 0

Union forces wanted control not only of the Mississippi River, but the Ohio, Tennessee, and Cumberland Rivers (which they achieved by capturing Ft. Henry and Ft. Donelson). The Mississippi gave them a water route to use for movement of troops and supplies into the South, and by following the River to New Orleans and capturing the city, they were able to close off a major port of the Confederacy. (Control of the other rivers also provided a route to penetrate farther into the south with the assurance of the river to facilitate supply lines -- without that necessity, they were significantly limited in their ability to advance, needing proximity to Union-controlled territory or a railroad, and railroads in the South were few.)

You might be interested in

The Germans used the Schlieffen Plan, which involved quickly attacking

DedPeter [7]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

This plan was created by the German Gererals in the first world war to wage a succesful double war front. This plan firstly involved attacking France and Beljium.

4 0

3 years ago

Does the map suggest hypotheses about the relative importance to the Founders of the powers of the new government?

rjkz [21]

<span>The suggests a power structure by the way it is drawn. One figure is larger because he is the leader of the Army and President, George Washington. Other figures displayed have power in proportion to their relative size on the map.</span>

8 0

2 years ago

Why did British colonists oppose the Wool Act of 1699 and the Iron Act of 1750? They protected the home country’s economy at the

ivanzaharov [21]

Answer:

<u><em>They protected the home country’s economy at the colonists’ expense</em></u>.

Explanation:

Interestingly this colonist where affected after the Wool Act because it resulted in higher value of British clothes as a result of export ban of foreign wool.

The Iron Act which was meant to increase local iron production was opposed because they were resulting in losses for the growing iron and steel companies.

4 0

2 years ago

What did John tyler do that was an important

Luden [163]

Tyler was the first vice president to succeed to the presidency without being elected to the office. tyler served longer than any president in u.s. hisory who was never elected to the office

4 0

2 years ago

Which colony was established primarily for financial gain? A. New Haven B. Connecticut C. Maryland D. Rhode Island

Phoenix [80]

<h2>Answer:</h2>

<u>B. Connecticut colony</u> was primarily established for financial gains .

<h2>Explanation:</h2>

Among the 13 established colonies, Connecticut was the 5th and it became a colony in 1637 after the English-Dutch struggles. Population in the coastal area started the economy of the colony through fishing and whaling. It gained momentum with other people branching into building ships and shipping.

In the other parts of Connecticut colony, there was a trade of fur, rum, whiskey, timber products, livestock products, horsed maple syrup, etc. The economic boost was also a result of prohibiting import supplies from Britain. This improved manufacturing and entrepreneurship and also boosted other trade skills.

5 0

2 years ago