I believe the answer is: A.Smith knew that the invisible hand of the market was not concerned with the health of the laborer.
The power of invisible hand in the market only care about the power of supply and demand which would determine who will obtain the most wealth. Even if the process could disregard the wellness of many people, as long as the demand is met, consumers wouldn't put too much thought on the laborers.
I think the second one might be the answer but please let me know if Im wrong
I think it's just the right thing to do.
Explanation:
This process began in Britain in the 18th century and from there spread to other parts of the world. Although used earlier by French writers, the term Industrial Revolution was first popularized by the English economic historian Arnold Toynbee (1852–83) to describe Britain's economic development from 1760 to 1840.
After industrialization, many could no longer work at their own pace or rely on opportunities such as weaving for their income. Children were expected to go to work in factories along with their parents and lost the time they formerly had to spend with their families. An example of children working in the factories.
