To show how things may have changed in time things are going to develop between periods
Answer:
For the first, I would say being poorly represented.
For the second, ignorance and morals.
Explanation:
A lot of people have been raised to demand a change when they see injustices, some might go at it in a violent way, others might approach it in a more peaceful way. One thing you have to know about making big decisions, is that you will never please everyone. Someone is always going to be mad. It depends on their moral values as people. If you saw something that you thought was morally wrong, you would be upset too. They have tried peaceful protests and weren't heard, now they choose to incite violence because they have a voice and are represented in the media that way.
It all leads down to morals. The media says that if you aren't for it, you're automatically against it. If something the media does or activists do doesn't allign with people's morals, they choose the complete opposite because they think that's their only option.
Answer:
1. What does this image say to you? Be specific.
The image depicts sadness, despair, economic plight, poverty. It depicts hopelessness. The picture is one of the most famous taken during the Great Depression of the 1930s.
2. Can you relate to this woman and her two children?
She's very likely their mother, for the way that the two children cling to her. If not, she could be their aunt or step-mother. She is definitely not likely to be family unrelated to the children.
3. Approximately how old do you believe this woman to be? Her children? What made you come to that conclusion?
The woman must be in her late 30s or early 40s. The children are probably around 5 or 6. Their ages can be inferred by their physical appearance.
Because non-communist governments wanted to control its spread, and prevent other countries from becoming communist. I guess because communism's style of governance is unfair to some.
I’m not positive but I believe that it’s something to do with oil
