The United States was the last to join the Allied Powers because they did not want to be apart of the war. They joined the Allied Powers after Japan bombed Pearl Harbor.
A debate from the perspective of a Northerner over Missouri Statehood would be one talking about the importance of limiting slavery.
A argument from a Southerner would be one arguing that Northerners should allow slavery in states that want slavery.
<h3>What were the arguments for Missouri Statehood?</h3>
Missouri wanted to gain admission into the Union as a slave state and the North did not want this because they were against slavery spreading to other parts of the Union.
Southerners on the other hand, wanted slavery in Missouri as they believed that it would increase the power of slave states in Congress. They therefore argued that territories such as Missouri that wanted slavery, should be free to have slavery.
Find out more on Missouri Statehood at brainly.com/question/1855671.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be that the Men were in charge of the Household, and that young men were expected to complete military training at a relatively early age.</span></span>
Answer:
Sooner: A person who attempted to enter and claim the Unassigned Lands before the Dawes Act
homesteader: A person who claimed a portion of land and then lived on it for five years to gain ownership
Boomer: A person who settled on land illegally just before a land run
Explanation:
These terms are derived from the 19th century US history and are related with the,
- The Homestead Acts
- Indian Appropriations Act of 1889
- Land Rush of 1889
This was the time when many of the unassigned lands in the west were settled by the Europeans. Specially after the purchase of Louisiana.
