12. Shreyas orders a pizza for himself and eats 5/8 of the entire pizza. The next day he eats 1/3 of the remaining pizza as a sn
2 answers:
You might be interested in
I guess the function is . Then
and
.
The derivative is , but there is no
such that
This doesn't contradict Rolle's theorem because does not exists. In other words,
is not differentiable on (-27, 27), so the conditions of Rolle's theorem are not met. (Looks like that would be the last option, or the second to last option if the last one is "Nothing can be concluded")
For this case, we have to:
By definition, we know:
The domain of is given by all real numbers.
Adding or removing numbers to the variable within the root implies a translation of the function vertically or horizontally. In the same way, its domain will be given by the real numbers, independently of the sign of the term inside the root. Thus, it will always be defined.
So, we have:
with
:
is defined.
with
is also defined.
has a domain from 0 to ∞.
Adding or removing numbers to the variable within the root implies a translation of the function vertically or horizontally. For it to be defined, the term within the root must be positive.
Thus, we observe that:
is not defined, the term inside the root is negative when
.
While if it is defined for
.
Answer:
Option b