It is and should be the managers job to do that
Answer:
<h2>In this case,visit to the Butchart Garden is an excludable and non-rivalrous good and is an example of a Club Good.</h2>
Explanation:
First,since the Burchart Gardens charges an admission fee of $30 for each visitor,anyone who has not paid the fee cannot or will not be able to have access inside the garden.Therefore,it is currently not a free service for all the visitors.In this sense,a visit to the Butchart Garden is excludable.It can be assumed that any visitor who wishes to come inside the garden and have a visit will have to mandatorily pay the admission fee.
Secondly,as Butchart Garden is a public area and anyone who pays the admission fee can officially gain access to the garden,enjoyment of the natural and aesthetic beauty of the garden by any one visitor does not reduce the simultaneous enjoyment of any other visitor who has paid the admission fee and hence,gained access to the garden.In economic language,if we consider the garden visit as a particular commodity,then the consumption of the commodity by any one visitor or consumer does not reduce the simultaneous consumption of any other visitor/s or consumer/s,provided that they have all paid the admission fee to gain access to the commodity or garden in this case.Therefore,visits to the Butchart Garden can be considered as non-rivalrous.
Now,since the visit to the Butchart garden is both excludable and non-rivalrous in nature,it can be considered as an example of a Club Good.
Answer:
THERE ARE SCARCITY EVEN IN AN AFFLUENT COUNTRY LIKE THE UNITED STATES BECAUSE WANTS ARE LIMITED BUT NEEDS ARE UNLIMITED. SOME PEOPLE ARE POOR WHILE OTHERS ARE WEALTHY
Answer:
The answer is: Both parties could win, depending if there were other conditions established for the auction.
Explanation:
Usually when an auction is carried out there are conditions established beforehand by the auctioneer that must be fulfilled in order for the sale to be completed.
In this case, since we don´t know what other conditions the town of Sanford included in the auction, if any other condition at all, we can´t conclude which party could win the lawsuit. For instance if a reserve was required but Arthur and Arlene didn´t do the reserve deposit, then they will obviously lose. The same happens with other established conditions like a minimum price set, etc. But if no other condition established, then Arthur and Arlene could win.
Answer:
Personal liability
Explanation:
Jeri and Knute are shareholders in lighthouse tours LLC. As lighthouse tours LLC is a limited liability company, Jeri and Knute enjoy limited liability.
Legally, lighthouses LLC is independent of its shareholders. It has the right to own assets and incur liabilities. Should the company get to the dissolution stage, its assets will be used to settle its obligations. If the assets of the company are not sufficient, the shareholders' private properties cannot be used to pay the debts. Jeri and Knute will be liable only to the extent of capital contribution.
