What would have happened if both unions had survived into the 20th century?

1 answer:

7 0

For starters, we would likely have the United States of America on the northern half and the Confederate States on the southern half as two different countries. There would likely be a lot of slaves attempting to cross the border from the south so that they could be free. Slavery would still be a thing in the south, of course. There is also a large chance that America would have gone to war with the southern states, although it would not be considered a civil war at this point.

You might be interested in

how did the 13th amendment affect the relationship between the states & the national government and/or the relationship betw

MariettaO [177]

Answer:

the all new 3th is not affecting the relationship between all states because the national government is her/or any rason to believe love

Explanation:

sana po ay makatulong

5 0

3 years ago

Read a sentence from the first draft of a document-based essay on the persecution of Jews in Nazi Germany.

Grace [21]

The correct answer is C) a quote of Hitler's announcement, D) the reaction of Jewish business owners, and E) the types of business he boycotted.

<em>The details that would provide helpful factual support for this sentence are a quote of Hitler's announcement, the reaction of Jewish business owners, and the types of business he boycotted. </em>

The sentence was: "Hitler announced a boycott of Jewish-owned businesses."

So it would be very important to have a direct quote from Hitler, stating the reason why he made that decision. Another aspect is the type of business the decision affected and how impacted to the Jewish people. Finally, another important aspect would be to know the first impressions and opinions of the affected, in this case, the Jewish people that owned the business, because with this we can know the other side of the story.

8 0

3 years ago

Which statement best summarizes great Britain‘s motivation for entering World War I? Russian leaders ask for British Support aft

bezimeni [28]

Answer:

Great Britain demanded that Germany respect Belgium’s neutrality Germany refuse.

Explanation:

When Belgium refused to allow German troops to march through Belgian territory into France, Germany invaded a small nation, Belgium, which brought Britain, pledged to guarantee Belgian neutrality, into the war. Britain entered World War I after the expiration of an ultimatum to Germany. Britain could never tolerate German troops directly across the English Channel in any case.

7 0

2 years ago

What were andrew johnson policies concerning the rights of African Americans?

Lelu [443]

for the most part, historians view Andrew Johnson as the worst possible person to have served as President at the end of the American Civil War. Because of his gross incompetence in federal office and his incredible miscalculation of the extent of public support for his policies, Johnson is judged as a great failure in making a satisfying and just peace. He is viewed to have been a rigid, dictatorial racist who was unable to compromise or to accept a political reality at odds with his own ideas. Instead of forging a compromise between Radical Republicans and moderates, his actions united the opposition against him. His bullheaded opposition to the Freedmen's Bureau Bill, the Civil Rights Act of 1866, and the Fourteenth Amendment eliminated all hope of using presidential authority to affect further compromises favorable to his position. In the end, Johnson did more to extend the period of national strife than he did to heal the wounds of war.

Most importantly, Johnson's strong commitment to obstructing political and civil rights for blacks is principally responsible for the failure of Reconstruction to solve the race problem in the South and perhaps in America as well. Johnson's decision to support the return of the prewar social and economic system—except for slavery—cut short any hope of a redistribution of land to the freed people or a more far-reaching reform program in the South.

Historians naturally wonder what might have happened had Lincoln, a genius at political compromise and perhaps the most effective leader to ever serve as President, lived. Would African Americans have obtained more effective guarantees of their civil rights? Would Lincoln have better completed what one historian calls the "unfinished revolution" in racial justice and equality begun by the Civil War? Almost all historians believe that the outcome would have been far different under Lincoln's leadership.

Among historians, supporters of Johnson are few in recent years. However, from the 1870s to around the time of World War II, Johnson enjoyed high regard as a strong-willed President who took the courageous high ground in challenging Congress's unconstitutional usurpation of presidential authority. In this view, much out of vogue today, Johnson is seen to have been motivated by a strict constructionist interpretation of the Constitution and by a firm belief in the separation of powers. This perspective reflected a generation of historians who were critical of Republican policy and skeptical of the viability of racial equality as a national policy. Even here, however, apologists for Johnson acknowledge his inability to effectively deal with congressional challenges due to his personal limitations as a leader.

7 0

3 years ago

Describe the treatment Solomon (Platt) receives while a slave for Mr. Ford.

Svetlanka [38]

I think it would be nice to see you and your family to the next eoeeeue or

5 0

3 years ago