1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
prisoha [69]
3 years ago
14

To show that they had no intentions of acquiring territory, the United States and Great Britain:

History
2 answers:
Mrac [35]3 years ago
6 0
In 1941, the Atlantic Charter was signed by Great Britain and the United States, stating that neither country wanted to acquire territory nor would attempt to govern other nations.
Igoryamba3 years ago
6 0

The Atlantic Charter is a joint declaration signed on August 14, 1941, aboard the USS Augusta, "while sailing somewhere in the Atlantic." The Atlantic Conference was held from August 9 to 12, 1941. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt spoke on behalf of the United States and Winston Churchill on behalf of Great Britain. It states that it has deemed it convenient "to make known certain common principles in the national policy of their respective countries, on which rest their hopes of achieving a better future for the world."

Some of the principles were:

• Do not seek for their countries territorial aggrandizement or any other kind.

• Do not want territorial modifications that are not in accordance with the freely expressed wishes of the peoples concerned.

• Respect the right of peoples to choose the government regime under which they are to live, wishing that sovereign rights and independence be restored to the people who have been forcibly deprived of those rights.

You might be interested in
Help!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Volgvan
Answer:

I’m pretty sure it’s D.

Explanation:
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In a few sentences, describe where the power lies in a democracy.
Solnce55 [7]

There are many theories to power, be they liberal, socialist or otherwise. Many have been developed over centuries of thought, which pick apart the very nature of our society and world order. But of all the theories that I’ve come across, one sticks out more than any other, and it is the reason I hold such strong free-market/anti-state views. It’s called Public Choice theory, but don’t ask me why, because it seems to explain why any one but ’the public’ makes choices today.

Public Choice theory is modern, having only really taken off during the 1960’s, but I believe it grants a very realistic and worrying view of Britain’s power structure, and exposes many very deep scars which socialism and Keynesianism unintentionally inflicted on our country. It was heavily developed by the US economist James Buchanan, who won the 1986 Nobel Memorial Prize for his work, and who advised Margaret Thatcher through the Institute for Economic Affairs during the late 1970′s.

Just like capitalism, Public Choice theory is based on two simple assumptions about human nature. Firstly, that humans are principally self-interested. That’s not to say we’re selfish, which is somewhat more immoral, but rather that we will always aim to fulfil our wants and desires, economic or otherwise. Secondly, that humans are rational; when presented with a series of options, we will select whichever makes us the most happy for the least cost. Rational Choice theory, as it is called, has come under substantial intellectual attack in the past, and I don’t personally believe that all humans act completely rationally all the time, but as a model for human behaviour, I’d say it provides a pretty good analysis.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did civilizations first arise along the Fertile Crescent?
Licemer1 [7]
C is the correct answer . Hope it helps
5 0
2 years ago
What are the correctly appreviated units for the answer in the question above?
OverLord2011 [107]
Cant answer without the question
8 0
3 years ago
Three ways in which one's acceptance of responsibility can influence effective community
Ksivusya [100]

When you know what it is you have to do then you can it can benefit your community tremendously.  When you take responsibility and face up to what has to be done it lessens the burdens that a community has to resolve.  When you accept responsibility for mistakes you make it alleviates any factor that can cause conflict within the community.  Facing up to and accepting responsibility are signs of a tight-knitted community and that is an effective community.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are the names of the two branches of Islam that were created after the civil war
    10·1 answer
  • What’s the similarities between Jews in the German and Japanese in America
    12·1 answer
  • Did everyone own slaves in the south
    12·2 answers
  • What are the 2 important decisions/interpretations that came out of the Dred Scott case
    13·1 answer
  • What did the woman of America fight for the most
    12·1 answer
  • What was the political importance of the deceleration of independence
    12·1 answer
  • Why do you think bread was such an important part of the French diet?
    10·1 answer
  • How did the rights movements of the 60s and 70s expand rights for diverse groups of americans?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes the federal government's response to Upton Sinclair's The Jungle?
    8·2 answers
  • In 1767, Parliament met to discuss
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!