1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
inysia [295]
4 years ago
14

Did it become more or less difficult to classify organisms as you moved down the taxonomy levels (Ex. Which was easier: classify

ing an organism into its kingdom or species)? Why do you think this is true? Explain your answer.
Advanced Placement (AP)
1 answer:
gayaneshka [121]4 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The farther I moved down the taxonomy levels it becomes harder because at the top the classifications in the domain or kingdom are very broad. The farther you move down the more specific and detailed the classifications get. Also, there are many different groupings from the family classification to the subspecies classification which makes it harder for one to classify because of the about of precision you need to classify and put an organism into which ever group it goes into.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What is the difference in<br> Roman Republic versus<br> Roman Imperial Art?(style /context)
shepuryov [24]

Answer:

The largest functional difference between the late republic and the early imperial government was essentially that the republic was unable to control the vast empire while the imperial system could. ... Indeed much of the key expansion of the Roman Empire occurred while it was still a Republic

5 0
3 years ago
Solve x^2-4x-7=0 by completing the
Hitman42 [59]
\left[x _{2}\right] = \left[ 2+\sqrt{11}\right][x​2​​]=[2+√​11​​​]
totally answer
5 0
3 years ago
How have the uses of photography changed over the years? Compare and contrast the historical uses of photography with the ways t
Vlad [161]

Explanation:

<h3>Technically, photography has changed in that digital imaging has matured and advanced image making creativeness possibilities and quality beyond what most people could conceive 20 years ago.</h3>

<h3>Professionally, the advent of easy to use digital cameras and unlimited shooting for essentially free has basically destroyed the professional photographers’ ability to charge a relatively living wage for work. A few still command decent prices, but the digitization has created commoditization, which alway equals pricing deterioration.</h3>

<h3>The way we view images has changed from open and inviting prints on refrigerators, desks and walls; to email snap shots that must be opened to participate and that we invest 5 seconds in viewing before terminating them.</h3>

<h3>As with every industry that has been impacted by digitization, great disruption has occurred. Sometimes for the better as in expanding the top one percent of creatives and in potential image quality. Most times in diluting image quality by diluting the talent pool with mediocre uncommitted practitioners. (Like adding water to good wine, the more water the less desirable the wine. Taste, personality, and care are wasted by the dilution.)</h3>

<h3>Socially, the so called democratization of photography through digital has diluted the commitment to quality image making. Many people are just happy to get an image, even when they are beyond mediocre.</h3>

<h2><u> </u><u> </u><u> </u><u> </u><u> </u><u> </u><u> </u><u> </u><u> </u><u>Confirm</u><u>.</u><u> </u></h2><h2><u>#Brainliest</u><u> </u><u>Answer</u><u> </u></h2>
8 0
3 years ago
Sowing community 2.3
denis-greek [22]

Answer:

Studies show that flowers make people smile, they unite us, make us friendlier, they create community, they even improve memory and the quality of life.

2.3 Measurements. Before sowing of the ΔBEF Experiment, we determined the seed bank to estimate the number of viable seeds of the target communities.

Explanation:

i didn't get the question so i put what i thought you meant, sorry if it's wrong

3 0
3 years ago
The ethical treatment of human and animal subjects is an important part of research in psychology. Respond to the following ques
tino4ka555 [31]

The researcher who deals with scientific research that uses human beings must meet the ethical guidelines that guarantee the safety of the participating humans. There are several guidelines that must be applied according to the tests and the elements to which these human beings will be submitted. However, in general, we can affirm that it is the researcher's duty to request the participant's informed consent, without coercing or influencing him to give consent. In addition, the researcher must ensure that the research has a balance between risks and benefits and inform the participant of all of this. The researcher must ensure that the participant receives humane and fair treatment.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Please help need the answer in 30minutes. Helpppp thank you !!
    12·1 answer
  • Which one of the following pieces of music would you most expect to be played by a full orchestra?        A. Symphony   B. Chamb
    9·1 answer
  • 7.   A visual poster can be used to help the child 
    15·2 answers
  • What are some instances when you would need to email your teacher or superior
    12·1 answer
  • 1. How is nuclear power different from power generated by fossil fuel combustion?
    10·1 answer
  • A metamorphic rock forms direct pressure.the rock is
    6·2 answers
  • How did the conquistador Cortés propose to overthrow the Mexican monarch Montezuma? A. by having him publicly executed B. by hav
    8·2 answers
  • What were the effects of Chinese cultural traditions on east asia over time?
    5·1 answer
  • A good scientific can be repeated by others
    9·1 answer
  • WHY ARE REESE'S CALLED REESE'S I MUST KNOOOOOWWWW
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!