Answer:
Explanation:
The example you used is a perfect example. As conditions changed, new amendments had to be added to reflect the needed changes. Here are some of the amendments added.
13
14
15
All have to do with the colored getting the vote. The founding fathers knew that these amendments were necessary but they could not bring them about. It took a bloody civil war 85 years later to get it right with the amendments listed above.
19 is for women's right to vote.
Prohibition (forbidding drinking) is the 18th amendment. People wanted to try the experiment of prohibiting the sale and interstate transportation of alcohol. The experiment didn't work and the 21 st amendment repealed prohibition.
The 22nd amendment limits the president's term in office to 2 terms.
I've given you a slew of amendments because the writers of the constitution had no idea in the world that so much change would become needed. Conditions change needs.
The right answer is B. A law banning all automatic and semiautomatic firearms.
The second amendment states: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. The law is divided in two pieces. The first one is related with the need of a state security, in this case militia, to protect the security of the citizens. And the second part, is related with the inalienable right of people to keep and bear firearms, as one tools against aggressors and tyrannical government. A law imposing restrictions to the right of bear firearms would be in total opposition of the second amendment.
When analyzing a source, historian has to remain unbiased and free from personal feelings and opinions. They know that there are different source of an event and they may reveal different facts which could cross-check his argument. The objective historiography is possible only when the historian is unbiased and when different sources like archaeological, literary and other sources are cross-checked and interpreted independently.
Answer :
President Woodrow Wilson of the United States did not agree completely with the other Allies. He wanted a peace treaty based on justice, not bitterness. He believed that would produce a lasting peace. President Wilson had led negotiations for a truce to end the hostilies of World War One.
I hope I can help you :) Have a great day
Answer:
Definitely 0
Explanation:
0 is the biggest number of all numbers. Very powerful, also the number of friends I have so check and mate.
