Answer:
Philistines migrated from the Mediterranean region.
Philistines conquered Canaanite cities.
The Kingdom of Israel took control of what had been Canaan.
Explanation:
The 3 events above happens to be those events that resulted in the migration of the Hebrews.
I am pretty sure it would be the Spanish. The Spanish were ruthless conquistadors that would do anything to win their battles back when all this was going on.
According to the context, Pitirim Sorokin's belief that societies have a natural tendency toward social change is called the principle of immanent change.
<h3>What is social change? </h3>
It is a modification or fluctuations experienced by the structure of a society in relation to its norms, values or forms of government, Pitirim Sorokin addressed social differentiation, social stratification, and social conflict.
Consequently, he believed that human history, rather than tending in a linear sense towards progress, is subject to a continuous succession of fluctuations toward social change, he called this process the principle of immanent change.
Therefore, we can conclude that according to the context, Pitirim Sorokin's belief that societies have a natural tendency toward social change is called the principle of immanent change.
Learn more about the social change here: brainly.com/question/22694333
#SPJ4
Answer:
<u><em>The answer is</em></u>: <u>"Mercantilism"</u>.
Explanation:
<em>The wealth of England by foreign trade (1664) Mun defends</em> <u>"Mercantilism"</u>, <em><u>this was raised as a</u></em> "<em><u>unifying system</u></em>" <em>in the effort to motivate work, to mitigate unemployment that during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries was lived in the West.
</em>
<u><em>The answer is</em></u>: <u>"Mercantilism"</u>.