What is the proof for 3(2x-4)=4x+10?
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Well, you could assign a letter to each piece of luggage like so...
A, B, C, D, E, F, G
What you could then do is set it against a table (a configuration table to be precise) with the same letters, and repeat the process again. If the order of these pieces of luggage also has to be taken into account, you'll end up with more configurations.
My answer and workings are below...
35 arrangements without order taken into consideration, because there are 35 ways in which to select 3 objects from the 7 objects.
210 arrangements (35 x 6) when order is taken into consideration.
*There are 6 ways to configure 3 letters.
Alternative way to solve the problem...
Produce Pascal's triangle. If you want to know how many ways in which you can choose 3 objects from 7, select (7 3) in Pascal's triangle which is equal to 35. Now, there are 6 ways in which to configure 3 objects if you are concerned about order.
A, B, C, D, E, F, G
What you could then do is set it against a table (a configuration table to be precise) with the same letters, and repeat the process again. If the order of these pieces of luggage also has to be taken into account, you'll end up with more configurations.
My answer and workings are below...
35 arrangements without order taken into consideration, because there are 35 ways in which to select 3 objects from the 7 objects.
210 arrangements (35 x 6) when order is taken into consideration.
*There are 6 ways to configure 3 letters.
Alternative way to solve the problem...
Produce Pascal's triangle. If you want to know how many ways in which you can choose 3 objects from 7, select (7 3) in Pascal's triangle which is equal to 35. Now, there are 6 ways in which to configure 3 objects if you are concerned about order.
1) Inverse function:
2)
3)
Step-by-step explanation:
1)
In this first method, we want to find the inverse function of .
The original function is:
We rewrite it as
We swap the name of the variables:
Adding +4 on both sides:
And dividing by 3 on both sides:
which is identical to :
2)
In this second method, we want to use the output of one function as input to the other function, and show that the output value is equal to the imput value.
We start using the function
We choose . We find:
Now we use this output value as input in the function
Substituting ,
So, the final output value (1) is equal to the input value (1).
3)
Here we want to verify that the two are inverse functions by showing that
We have
Substituting g(x) into f(x),
Viceversa, we want to show that
Substituting g(x) into f(x), we get
So, the two functions are one the inverse of the other.
Learn more about inverse functions:
#LearnwithBrainly