Answer:
However its widespread and indiscriminate use in stifling genuine political discourse made it deeply unpopular, and became increasingly reviled within India. ... The act was re-enacted during World War II as Defence of India act 1939.
Hello there,
Individual wealth is not taken into account, so it's a poor indication of prosperity in general. They are doing this to measure quality.
Hope this helps.
~Jurgen
I believe the answer is Spain.
Answer:
Most states require that all electoral votes go to the candidate who receives the most votes in that state. After state election officials certify the popular vote of each state, the winning slate of electors meet in the state capital and cast two ballots—one for Vice President and one for President. Electors cannot vote for a Presidential and Vice Presidential candidate who both hail from an elector’s home state. For instance, if both candidates come from New York, New York’s electors may vote for one of the candidates, but not both. In this hypothetical scenario, however, Delaware’s electors may vote for both New York candidates. This requirement is a holdover from early American history when one of the country’s major political fault lines divided big states from small states. The founders hoped this rule would prevent the largest states from dominating presidential elections.
Explanation:
Hope this helps if not sorry
The factors that made it difficult for Eastern Europe to improve its water quality were outdated sewer systems, raw water quality, worn-out water utilities and unskilled employees. So we can say that four options given in the question fits the bill perfectly. These basic infrastructural reasons were responsible for being a hurdle towards improving the water quality. <span />
