In what way was the confederation of states “ loose”?

History

2 answers:

katrin2010 [14]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

The Articles created a loose confederation of sovereign states and a weak central government, leaving most of the power with the state governments. The need for a stronger Federal government soon became apparent and eventually led to the Constitutional Convention in 1787.

Explanation:

LUCKY_DIMON [66]3 years ago

4 0

After being controlled by Britain for so long, Americans were not inclined to hand over power to another central government—even one they elected. For that reason, the proposed Articles of Confederation created a framework for a loose confederation of states.

Ultimately, the Articles of Confederation failed because they were crafted to keep the national government as weak as possible: There was no power to enforce laws. No judicial branch or national courts. Amendments needed to have a unanimous vote.

I hope this helps!

You might be interested in

What did catharune beecher did

Alik [6]

Answer:

She worked through the Board of National Popular Education (1847–48), a private agency headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio, and in 1852 founded the American Woman's Educational Association to recruit and train teachers to staff schools on the frontier.

Explanation:

THIS IS WHAT I KNOW!

5 0

3 years ago

why did the coerced labor, especially slavery become so important i nits history and what were the cultural results of that impo

vaieri [72.5K]

Much more mixed cultures eg brazil. industrilisation of most cultures who used slavery through cheap labour that benifited the society eg russia but also at a great cost usually death disease and social unrest

7 0

3 years ago

Who took the lead in establishing the washington administration's domestic priorities?

lukranit [14]

Alexander Hamilton! Hope this helps :)

5 0

3 years ago

Need help please! Describing the contributions of greeks and romans to the western civilization.

icang [17]

perdon no se espero que no te enojes espero que sirva mi consuelo

3 0

3 years ago

Students at Birdville High have animosity towards their new history teacher. They stage

tatuchka [14]

Answer:

Yes, the Bill of Rights does protect this.

Explanation:

This is protected under the First Amendment, specifically the "...the right of the people peaceably to assemble...". The First Amendment protects all speech, unless it is threatening violence on another person, as well as any peaceful protests.

There are a few important details that seal the deal when it comes to the Bill of Rights protection. First, they have set up the demonstration outside the school, on public land. If it was on private land, that land owner can lawfully ask them to leave the premises and press charges if they don't. Second, they were peaceful in their actions, making personal speeches about the teacher. The second that protest becomes violent (turning into a riot), they would be removed and their message would lose all of its ground.

So both of these conditions helps the First Amendment create a very strong wall of protection around their case, that is unless the city decides to come and fine them for not having a protesting permit... ;)

Amendment I:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

3 0

3 years ago