Answer:
-5
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
y = 60
Step-by-step explanation:
<h3>Step 1: Make sense of the given</h3>
"The ratio of y to x is 3"
This means that, 
"The sum of y and x is 80"
This means, 
<h3>Step 2: Make use of the facts</h3>
If , then 
.
We can plug this into the other equation by substitution:
This simplifies to:
Which we can solve out and get:
.
<h3>Step 3: Plug and Chug</h3>
We solved for x, but we need the value of y.
So, we go back to the equation we first derived: "".
And now we substitute the value of x, into this.
By solving this out, we get:
So, the value of y is 60.
Total value: $144
Explanation: each book cost $4.50
Answer:
For the reasons mentioned in the explanation section, it is indeed a weak generalization:
Step-by-step explanation:
- No, there is not enough data provided on certain subjects' age, socioeconomic status, etc. that may have influenced the investing decision.
- No, the survey isn't random, the study is irregular because each has a fair probability of expressing their true beliefs, here in this query it's written they've been told individuals are given actual medication, which may have contributed to the Hawthorne studies giving incorrect outcomes.
- No, the amount isn't sufficient mostly on the premise of 28 subject areas with be provided oxytocin, and therefore only one test being performed should we not be able to determine the results to implement for certain persons including billions of populace, it would be a hurried generalization.
Y=10. Hopefully this picture explains it
