Answer:
Explanation:
He compares the role of a supreme court justice to that of an umpire in baseball or a referee in football or hockey.
He says for example, that those neutrals would never favor a team for person reasons. A team would never get unfair treatment if they were in a do or die match and had not been in such a match for 50 or more years while their opponents had one this match multiple times. Such behavior would be unthinkable.
He stated that one must uphold the rules as given to him. The idea of a referee or umpire falls apart a little here, but a supreme court justice is not obligated to uphold rules which are unconstitutional. His job is to fairly judge what should be decided. It does not matter what his own thoughts on abortion might be: he must rule on what the constitution would say about such matters.
Sometimes it is not always easy.
Sorry I’m as dumb as a rock that’s I gotta answer ppl
The correct answer is "You" is on outer cicle.
The Conversation Prism is an infographic that presents the effervescent panorama of social networks. The tool was originally created by Briam Solis and has been used worldwide as a map to identify the best channels for engagement and dissemination on the social web.
#1 Ice Cream
#2 Mayonnaise
#3 Piano
#4 Light bulb
#5 Gas turbine
#6 Bicycles
#7 The first Ambulance
#8 Cotton gin
#9 Ball bearings
#10 Preserving jar
#11 Soft drink (soda)
#12 Batteries
#13 Lithographing
#14 Smallpox vaccination <span />
Answer:
Structural functionalist theory
Explanation:
The structural and functional theory that sees the society as the structure that is interrelated with the functions and the biological needs of the society. There are many criticisms about this theory that it would not adequately explain the social change in society. There were powerful people have more power than less powerful people.
This theory has a circular nature. It defines the repeated behavior that called functionalism. So that this is the only theory that explains why people have different occupations and have different income levels. Many of the sociologists told that this was unfair because of some powerful people.
