It suggests that the heat has real power to change its environment
When the people had to advocate for someone else or a group of people or even for themself they need to determine a clear objective, doing research for the topic and most importantly develop a grassroots strategy.
<h3>What is advocacy?</h3>
Advocacy is defined as the act of speaking on behalf of or in support of another person, place, or thing.
A non-profit organization that works to assist women who have experienced domestic abuse but are too afraid to speak up for themselves is an example of advocacy.
When the people had to advocate for some one else or a group of people or even for themself they need to determine a clear objective, doing research for the topic and most importantly develop a grassroots strategy.
Thus, this can be done when people had to advocate for some one else or a group of people, or even for themself.
For more details regarding advocacy, visit:
brainly.com/question/960252
#SPJ1
I looked this question up and found the complete version online. The research question is:
"Why do high school students no spend enough time doing physical activity every day?"
Answer:
The statement which is the best evaluation of the research question is:
A. It is too biased; this research question contains an opinion and cannot be answered through research.
Explanation:
The author of the research question states an opinion when he/she says that high school students do not spend enough time doing physical activity. We do not know if this is true, if it is a fact. Had the author stated the question is a different manner, perhaps even providing some data, then it may have had some factual validity. For example: "A new study shows that 95% of high school students only exercise once a week. What are the reasons behind that number?" That question would not be based on an opinion, but on a fact. It would be easier to come up with a research - an interview, for instance - that would actually find out the reasons why that happens.
Answer:
See below
Explanation:
"Students should not play politics" is a tone-deaf argument used by gatekeeping politicians who shut their doors to the struggling youth. For how many years have students complained about their schooling system, only to be turned down due to a lack of funds? When students try to participate in shaping the world, <em>their </em>world, they're treated like children. Students are expected to attend school full-time without being paid or publicly acknowledged. "Students should not play politics" holds little ground and defense for those who use it. What if a student is <em>studying</em> politics? Shouldn't they be able to use their expertise to contribute to political conversations? All inclusivity issues aside, politics will eventually become outdated if the people who run it refuse to listen to students and the younger generations. Most politicians are old and their views are outdated... why not listen to the people next in line? In conclusion, "students should not play politics" is only a restrictive, weak argument at its very core.
Because it explains experience, it follows under the line of ethos
C. Ethos :)
