According to Carl Rogers, what happens when people experience anxiety is that they feel that their self-concept is at odds with their experience. Carl Ransom Rogers is a known Psychologist and founded the Humanistic approach to psychology. Hope this helps.
Yes i agree with you because yes and yes yes it is ok I have a small number of that I can do it for you to do it for me please thank you bye bye
<span>Some criticisms of Carl Roger's theory are:
- He considers that parents must show unconditional approval to their children, however, there are children with very harmful behaviors to whom approval cannot be shown.
- His concept of human nature is that it always tends to good and healthy, and it has been proven that this is not always the case.
- Considers that a relationship of unconditional positive respect should be shown in the therapeutic relationship, but there has been a lot of criticism if the therapists can or should do it in all cases. <span>For example, with very aggressive patients.
I hope my answer can help you.
</span></span>
Answer:
1.Judaism, Christianity, Islam
2.Judaism, Islam, Christianity
3.Islam, Christianity, Judaism
4.Christianity, Judaism, Islam
Explanation:
Answer:
Inadmissible, because prior bad acts cannot be admitted to prove the defendant's propensity to commit the specific crime with which he is charged
Explanation:
Evidence
This is refered to as a group or a collective mass of things such as testimony and exhibits etc.
Trier of law helps to know what laws apply to the case, decides on what evidence is admissible, reviews written briefs submitted by both sides, gives legal points and authories relevant to the decision etc.
The role of prosecutor
They are responsible for filing of charges, trials, and appeals, review the actions of police officers, make judgements on whether they were appropriate etc.
The role of defense is responsible for trial strategy.
The evidence is admissible in court are only important evidence related to its admissible in court. In some few cases, relevant evidence will not be admitted in court.
A relevant evidence is inadmissible if it one is when the evidence found is in violation of the defendants constitutional rights or violations of the hearsay rule that state that information is opportuned.etc.
