Answer:
C. Self-determination.
Explanation:
Self-determination, which U.S. president Woodrow Wilson preferred to call "self-government," was a political condition which he considered essential if the world was to have a peaceful co-existence after the huge levels violence, and loss of human lives and property caused by World War I. Unfortunately, the French delegation that negotiated peace with Germany and the other countries of the Central Powers, took over complete control of the negotiation and Wilson' proposal, or The Fourteen Points, was ignored.
Mr. Justice Jackson, dissenting. . . .
Much is said of the danger to liberty from the Army program for deporting and detaining these citizens of Japanese extraction. But a judicial construction of the due process clause that will sustain this order is a far more subtle blow to liberty than the promulgation of the order itself. A military order, however unconstitutional, is not apt to last longer than the military emergency. Even during that period a succeeding commander may revoke it all. But once a judicial opinion rationalizes such an order to show that it conforms to the Constitution, or rather rationalizes the Constitution to show that the Constitution sanctions such an order, the Court for all time has validated the principle of racial discrimination in criminal procedure and of transplanting American citizens. . . . A military commander may overstep the bounds of constitutionality, and it is an incident. But if we review and approve, that passing incident becomes the doctrine of the Constitution. There it has a generative power of its own, and all that it creates will be in its own image. Nothing better illustrates this danger than does the Court’s opinion in this case. . . .
yes i copy and pasted but this is your answer
<span>The correct answer is letter c, which is, it takes a subjective case-by-case approach to the question of incorporation in regards with the supreme court’s use of selective incorporation. The case-by-case approach is a way of using a decision forcing case in which the individual involved is likely to play a role of having to face a hard decision that occurred in the past.</span>
