It protects us from the government.
Without amendments we will not have the freedom of speech or right to religion.
We would basically be living in a communist society like China.
Plato believed that aristocracy form of government are achievable political consequence to civilizations with one monarch.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The idea on political consequence to civilization with one idea was not achievable in the early centuries because of the advantages the monarchs took over the society. There was instability and dis - functioning and rise of feudalism.
Yet, Plato believed that aristocracy form of government are achievable political consequence to civilizations with one monarch. In his book Republic, Plato states the form of government that can achieve political consequence to civilizations with one monarch if people understand what is clarity and reality and fake. The understanding of ever rank people should be common.
i think your answer is Harry Truman. Harry Truman gave the first televised presidential speech
Hi there!
If I was in that situation. I'd feel very threatened and scared for my life considering the fact that the 2 different colored people always had rivalry, but I'd have to be brave and subside the worst of the worst and look forward to whats to come for a brighter future. Sure, theres going to be a lot of chaos before the better, but I guess thats how people get over the differences. Considering all the chaotic choices and decisions you can't help, but feel like an outcast. So, its sometimes best to watch out for your back in case for anything that says the word "wrong" is going to happen.
<em>I hope this is good enough</em>
-<u>WolfieWolfFromSketch</u>
Answer: The Prince (Italian: Il Principe [il ˈprintʃipe], Latin: De Principatibus) is a 16th-century political treatise written by the Italian diplomat and political theorist Niccolò Machiavelli as an instruction guide for new princes and royals. The general theme of The Prince is of accepting that the aims of princes – such as glory and survival – can justify the use of immoral means to achieve those ends.[1]
From Machiavelli's correspondence, a version appears to have been distributed in 1513, using a Latin title, De Principatibus (Of Principalities).[2] However, the printed version was not published until 1532, five years after Machiavelli's death. This was carried out with the permission of the Medici pope Clement VII, but "long before then, in fact since the first appearance of The Prince in manuscript, controversy had swirled about his writings".[3]
Although The Prince was written as if it were a traditional work in the mirrors for princes style, it is generally agreed that it was especially innovative. This is partly because it was written in the vernacular Italian rather than Latin, a practice that had become increasingly popular since the publication of Dante's Divine Comedy and other works of Renaissance literature.[4][5]
The Prince is sometimes claimed to be one of the first works of modern philosophy, especially modern political philosophy, in which the "effectual" truth is taken to be more important than any abstract ideal. It is also notable for being in direct conflict with the dominant Catholic and scholastic doctrines of the time, particularly those concerning politics and ethics.[6][7]
Although it is relatively short, the treatise is the most remembered of Machiavelli's works and the one most responsible for bringing the word Machiavellian into usage as a pejorative. It even contributed to the modern negative connotations of the words politics and politician in Western countries.[8] In subject matter it overlaps with the much longer Discourses on Livy, which was written a few years later. In its use of near-contemporary Italians as examples of people who perpetrated criminal deeds for politics, another lesser-known work by Machiavelli which The Prince has been compared to is the Life of Castruccio Castracani.
