1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pychu [463]
3 years ago
7

Seven facts why people shouldn’t have guns?

History
2 answers:
hammer [34]3 years ago
5 0
- it can end up in the wrong hands
- people not being responsible
- guns are very dangerous
- Having access to a gun increases the risk of violence.
- people who shouldn’t own guns can still
purchase them.
- most public deaths are caused by massed shootings
- guns are very harmful to people as they can use it in advance to harm another’s life
gayaneshka [121]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Explanation:

1. If they have domestic violence they should never have the chance for life to own one.

2. Mentally unstable shouldn't own guns.

3. Gun violence offenses should be automatic taking the guns away.

4. If you are an alcholic and I mean not able to drive etc you should not have a gun.

5. Guns should have gun safes to keep CHILDREN from accessing guns and causing self harm to them or any one close to them.

6. Background checks in all 50 states and if it comes back with a felon automatic no gun sale. ( And stopping black market sales that criminals get guns that they SHOULD NOT have access too.)

7. And if you been to prison for anything that means you are not allowed to EVER in your own lifetime be able to purchase a gun.

You might be interested in
What were the three "G's" that motivated most people to come to the "new world"?
marysya [2.9K]

Answer:

1. god glory and gold

2. southern colonies

3. new England colonies

4. plantation

5. the middle colonies

6. England france and spain

7. steps toward repersentive governments

8. it established a form of self government based on social contract

9. Virginia house of burgesses

10. true

11. elect the representative and new laws

12. the plantation system

13. 4.

14. along large bodies of water

15. it was the first successful english colony

16. the passage to america and britain

17. maps of goods and services

18. slavery was a critical part of the economy

19. Atlantic

20. true

8 0
3 years ago
the 1803 ruling in marbury v. madison affected the balance of power in federal government by giving the judiciary a way to
strojnjashka [21]
Review any federal, state, or local law/action to if it is constitutional
6 0
3 years ago
All of the following statements are true EXCEPT:
Novosadov [1.4K]

Answer:

The Answer is C

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Select the correct text in the passage.
ryzh [129]

<u>This portion of the text emphasizes the natural rights of people:</u>

  • <em>Man being born ...  with a title to perfect freedom and an uncontrolled enjoyment of all the rights and privileges of the law of Nature ...  hath by nature a power not only to preserve his property— that is, his life, liberty, and estate, against the injuries and attempts of other men</em>

Explanation:

Enlightenment thinkers like John Locke believed that using reason will guide us to the best ways to operate in order to create the most beneficial conditions for society.  For Locke, this included a conviction that all human beings have certain natural rights which are to be protected and preserved.    Locke's ideal was one that promoted individual freedom and equal rights and opportunity for all.  Each individual's well-being (life, health, liberty, possessions) should be served by the way government and society are arranged.  

Here's another excerpt section from Locke's <em> Second Treatise on Civil Government</em> (1690), in which he expresses the ideas of natural rights:

  • <em>The state of nature has a law of nature to govern it, which obliges every one: and reason, which is that law, teaches all mankind, who will but consult it, that being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions… (and) when his own preservation comes not in competition, ought he, as much as he can, to preserve the rest of mankind, and may not, unless it be to do justice on an offender, take away, or impair the life, or what tends to the preservation of the life, the liberty, health, limb, or goods of another.</em>
7 0
3 years ago
1.
pickupchik [31]
Answer would be A or D, the answer choices are dumb
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What started the civil war in Russia?
    8·2 answers
  • How was the constitution different from the articles of confederation?
    5·1 answer
  • Valentino and Eva are siblings who have inherited a large sum of money. They hope to use their inheritance to start a restaurant
    14·1 answer
  • Analizando la línea “evolutiva” de las cosmovisiones a lo largo de las distintas edades históricas, ¿qué hechos históricos fuero
    7·1 answer
  • What are the 3 big American cities that could be the next cape town ?
    9·1 answer
  • Henry Kissinger served as Secretary of State under President: Eisenhower Truman Nixon
    12·1 answer
  • The recent history of Kurdish nationalism includes all of the following except ____.
    11·1 answer
  • What is the difference between stone tool vs modern tools?
    6·1 answer
  • What two "conflicts" did the United States participate in during the Cold
    10·1 answer
  • Religion hundred the development of the medicine in the middle ages, how far do you agree?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!