While both Greek and Romans were pretty ethnocentric by modern standards, the Romans assimilated far more people into their institutional lives.
Many non-Greeks adopted Gteek lifestyles, language and habits after the age of Alexander, but the cross-pollination was more frequently cultural than political. Cleopatra might have dressed like an Egyptian queen and patronized the Egyptian gods, but she wouldn't have had Egyptian generals or Egyptian judges. The Greeks tended to settle into the cultures they occupied like the British in India: remaining separate from and believing themselves superior to the people around them, even while encouraging the 'natives' to adopt their culture habits.
Romans did a much more thorough job assimilating the peoples they conquered. Non-Romans could and did become citizens, even from very early times. This started with neighboring groups like the Latins, but eventually extend to the rest of Italy and later to the whole empire. Eventually there would be "Roman" emperors of Syrian, British, Spanish, Gallic, Balkan, and North African descent Farther down the social scale the mixing was much more complete (enough to irritate many Roman traditionalists). This wasn’t just a practical accommodation, either — when emperor Claudius allowed Gauls into the Roman Senate he pointed out that by his time the Romans had been assimilating former enemies since the days of Aeneas.
T<span>he term that refers to the belief that the United States had a duty to spread democracy across the continent is known as <span>A. Manifest Destiny.
It </span></span><span>was a widely held belief in the United States that its settlers were destined to expand across North America in the 19th century.</span>
Silas Deane was an American merchant, diplomat, politician, and a supporter of American independence. No one really knows how he died, but some say he was poisoned, that he overdosed, disease. He died after he fell ill and complained about stomach pain
hope this helps:)
Answer:
Babylon and Hittites were two different empires based on different geological locations, social structure, and cultural beliefs.
Explanation:
the first thing to the contrast between the two ancient empires was their different geological locations for example while the Babylonians were concentrated in the Mesopotamian region, the Hittites were in the Anatolian area. Religious convictions have had a major impact on the cultural side of life. While the Hittite people gave more importance to the local pantheon, temples during the Babylon empire were major influencers of cultural life.
<span>Women were expected to cook, clean, sew, care for the children, and care for the livestock. </span>
