First, look at the digits less than one one-hundredth (

, or .01):
0.00416
See if that number is closer to the higher or lower hundredth:
(if the first digit is 5 or greater, then higher;
if the first digit is 4 or lower, then lower)
Since 4 is closer to the lower hundred, round down
0.00416 -> 0.00000
Add this to the digits we didn't touch:
<span>17,546.32000 + 0.00000 = 17,546.32
</span>17,546.32416 rounded to the nearest hundredth is
C. <span>
17,546.32</span>
The answer is No because the sample is not representative of the whole population. The standard deviation of the sample is not a good estimate of the variation of the salaries of the TV personalities in general because a single sample is not counted as a whole. Standard Deviation is a quantity that is calculated to indicate the extent of deviation of the population or group as a whole. Standard deviation also represented by the symbol σ means sigma in Greek letter or s in Latin letter. It is also the measurement of a set of data values that are used to quantify the amount of variation.
Answer:
I cant see
Step-by-step explanation:
From the given statement, we know the following...
0.35x = $247 where x = the orginial number
So if we solve for x by dividing by 0.35
x = $247/0.35 = $705.71
J:V = 3:2
3:2 x 40 = 120:80
J: 120-15 = 105
V: 80+15 = 95
J:V is now 105:95
The original amount of peas that Julia had at first was 120.