1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mnenie [13.5K]
3 years ago
9

To be liable on a negotiable instrument, a person must:

Business
1 answer:
Ymorist [56]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The correct answer is letter "A": sign the instrument.

Explanation:

When talking about negotiable instruments, there are two types of liabilities: <em>Signature Liability </em>and <em>Warranty Liability</em>. Signature Liability refers to those documents where who signs is potentially liable for the responsibilities of the document stated. Warranty Liability is where the liability relies on the person to whom the document was transferred in good faith.

In both cases, <em>the initial holder of the document must sing the instrument so it will be clear to whom belongs the liability.</em>

You might be interested in
Which of the following statements is CORRECT? a. The current yield on Bond A exceeds the current yield on Bond B. Therefore, Bon
Svetach [21]

Answer:

I think its D im not sure

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Papa PePe's Pizza purchased a used pizza oven for $9785. The company makes a down payment of $1000 and agrees to 36 monthly paym
Mkey [24]

Answer:

$1,239.2

Explanation:

finance charge refer the cost of using credit funds. It is the total amount a borrower pays to lender on top of the amount borrowed.

In this case, the total amount the customer paid for the oven

The deposit $1000.00

Monthly installment; $278.45 x 36= $10,024.2

Total amount paid =$278.45 +$10,024.2

=11,024.2

finance charge =  total amount paid - cost of the item

= $11,024.2 - $9,785.

=$1,239.2

3 0
3 years ago
Consider the following case: John Smith is a archaeologist with a Ph.D. He has excavated sites across much of South America and
STatiana [176]

According to the case, the use of Ph.D. on the ads for hair care products by John Smith is considered an example of the fallacy of inappropriate expertise.

The provided statement is true.

<h3>What is a fallacy?</h3>

A fallacy is an unlawful statement that is used by someone in stating any reasoning or argument which can even be harmful to society.

In the given case, John is having Ph.D. degree in the archaeology field, and his attempt to use the word Ph.D. on the haircare goods marketed by him would be a fallacy in respect of inappropriate expertise. The fallacy could be the use of the Ph.D. word on ads and the inappropriate expertise is that he doesn't have any knowledge regarding skincare and dermatology area.

Therefore, this may create a harmful effect on the individuals who are buying them as it is not authorized by a dermatologist.

Learn more about the fallacy in the related link:

brainly.com/question/2516239

#SPJ1

5 0
2 years ago
People are more likely to engage in political behavior in organizations when?
aliina [53]

The correct answer is - when they want to achieve some objectives by influencing others.

The ability to influence plays a vital role in organisational politics when wanting to achieve some personal goals.

Organisational Politics

  • Organisational politics simply refers to the use of influencing capabilities in order to achieve some personal as well as organisation goals and objectives.
  • Generally, people who like power and are good at influence tactics tend to engage in workplace politics and usually engage with like minded people in order to use the limited resources for some goals.
  • Some of the activities include alliance building, negotiating and bargaining etc.

To learn more about politics, visit - brainly.com/question/14132580

#SPJ4

6 0
2 years ago
Joanne and Patrick work for two different corporations. Joanne's company is very structured, follows rigid rules, and expects em
snow_lady [41]

Answer: c. Joanne's company functions with a high uncertainty avoidance, whereas Patrick's company functions with low uncertainty avoidance

Explanation:

This uncertainty avoidance would propel Patrick's company to be unstructured and negligent.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Holding other factors constant, if food prices decline relative to the prices of other products, then the real wages of agricult
    6·1 answer
  • The process of writing off an intangible asset is
    6·1 answer
  • Please help! The marginal revenue product of the second worker is
    10·1 answer
  • Companies such as coca-cola generate more than half their annual revenues from sales outside the united states, including europe
    12·1 answer
  • Firms, households, and governments use the credit market for borrowing. The credit demand curve shows the relationship
    10·1 answer
  • The goal of financial management is to increase the:A. future value of the firm's total equity.B. book value of equity.C. divide
    6·1 answer
  • Microsoft’s annual dividend grew from its initial level of $0.32 per share in 2003 to its most current level in 2018 of $1.84 pe
    14·1 answer
  • What is the significance of price elasticity of demand to a producer​
    14·1 answer
  • 18)<br> Whiskey, gin, and vodka are examples of<br> spirits (3 pts).
    10·1 answer
  • If an auditor is expected to detect the overstatement of sales, what should the auditor trace transactions from?.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!