Answer: The Glorious Revolution, also called “The Revolution of 1688” and “The Bloodless Revolution,” took place from 1688 to 1689 in England. It involved the overthrow of the Catholic king James II, who was replaced by his Protestant daughter Mary and her Dutch husband, William of Orange.
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is b: in doubt until the great Union victories in the Battles of Atlanta and Mobile Bay
Explanation:
President Lincoln (1809-1865) was re-elected in the Election of 1864 mostly because of the great <em>Union</em> victories in the Battles of Atlanta and Mobile Bay. These two were significant blows to the <em>Confederacy</em>, and until those victories, Lincoln winning the election had been much in doubt. One of the reasons was that the <em>Civil War</em> was taking longer than expected to come to an end - but the spirit and morale in the North were lifted due to the Union victory in the two battles. This was a crucial aspect that secured the <em>re-election</em> of President Lincoln, who, on <em>November 8</em>, defeated George McClellan (1826-1885), his <em>Democratic competitor</em>, once a Union general.
This 1864 presidential election was only held only for those states which had not separated themselves from the <em>Union</em>.
<span>The commander's conclusion is based on utilitarianism, which is the belief that whatever action benefits the most people is the morally correct action to take. Even if that action is harmful to oneself or even illegal.</span>
Answer:
Correlation versus Causation.
Explanation:
These concepts can be said to have/seem deceptively similar. But recognizing their differences can be the make or break between wasting efforts on low value features and creating a product that your customers can’t stop raving about. In user behaviour, it is said that product managers, data scientists, and analysts will find this useful for leveraging the right insights for product growth, such as whether certain features impact user retention or engagement.
The corporations and unions have been able to spend unlimited sums of money on campaign advertising since 2010 because the Supreme Court ruled that campaign spending is a protected form of free speech.
Answer: Option B
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The Supreme Court in its judgement of a 2010 case fought between the parties 'Citizen United' and the 'Federal Election Commission' clarified that the expenditure made by a political party to communicate with its subjects forms an integral part of their freedom of speech and hence their spending on election campaigns cannot be capped by law.