Answer:
$50.67 per share
Explanation:
using the discounted cash flow model, we can determine Arras's total value:
CF₀ = $7.6
CF₁ = $7.98
CF₂ = $8.379
CF₃ = $8.79795
CF₄ = $9.2378475
CF₅ = $9.699739875
CF₆ = $9.893734673
we must first find the terminal value at year 5 = $9.893734673 / (7% - 2%) = $197.874694
now we can discount the future cash flows:
firm's value = $7.98/1.07 + $8.379/1.07² + $8.79795/1.07³ + $9.2378475/1.07⁴ + $9.699739875/1.07⁵ + $197.874694/1.07⁵ = $7.458 + $7.319 + $7.182 + $7.048 + $6.916 + $141.081 = $177.004 million
the shareholders' share of the firm's value = $177.004 million - $25 million = $152.004 million
price per share = $152.004 million / 3 million shares = $50.668 ≈ $50.67 per share
The missing word in the blank is :
small
hence the completed paragraph is:
The coach is weighing a slightly increased risk of losing against a slightly decreased risk of injury to the star quarterback. this weighing of trade-offs is an example of marginal thinking, because the star quarterback was in for most of the game, and the coach's decision concerns <u><em>small</em></u> shifts in probabilities with the game nearly over.
Answer:
option (d) $1.40 taxable income rather than $1.00 tax-exempt income
Explanation:
The taxpayer would prefer option (d) $1.40 taxable income rather than $1.00 tax-exempt income
The above statement will be chosen because in this case the after tax income will be greater than the tax exempt according to the condition given in the question
Given:
Marginal Tax bracket = 25%
thus,
Taxable income = $1.40
Tax = $1.40 × 0.25 = $0.35
Therefore,
The net income = Taxable income - Tax = $1.40 - $0.35 = $1.05
and,
$1.05 > $1.00
Answer:
The aggregate demand curve is downward sloping because when the general level of price rise; the real wealth of consumers will decline (with a certain amount of money you end up buying less goods), the interest rates will increase (as inflation increases, interest rates also increase), and the price of exported goods increases (as the general price of goods increase, the production of goods will also become more expensive).
Answer:
The amount of taxpayers that are part of the "older generation" is slowly rising and is higher than the amount in 1997.
Explanation:
Remember to run a successful government, you must have the income in which to run the government programs. Most of these funds come from taxpayer's. In this case, it is clear that younger people generally make more as well as are generally healthy, leading to a large amount of input of money into the government, with fewer withdrawals. This would give a huge boost to the government budget. Older people on the other hand tend to not work as much, so their taxes are generally lower. They also withdraw more from the Government through Social Security, and so leaves the government with a negative balance from them in most cases.
The chart on the other hand shows a <em>increase of percentage of older people</em>, which leaves a large gap in between the surplus and the spending, leading to a decrease of funding for the government. If this continues, the government would lose money, and would have to cut programs or face collapse. To fix this, they either have to, like stated above, cut programs, or give more taxes. Both are unacceptable to the American Public, which is what makes the government, as well as the average citizen, worried about the US government's funding surplus.
~
