Answer:
by Edgar Allan Poe from The Fall of the House of Usher “The Fall of the House of Usher” is a short story written by Edgar Allan Poe in 1839. Poe is considered a master of Gothic fiction, which centers on dark and terrifying stories. Poe focuses on psychological terror, as his characters often show madness. This passage is from the opening of “The Fall of the House of Usher.”
Explanation:
Huck Finn is thirteen years old.
- The book's main character and narrator. With in Mississippi River town of St. Petersburg, Missouri, Huck is the thirteen-year-old. Huck is conscientious, bright (albeit academically illiterate), and prepared to reach his own conclusions about critical issues, even if these findings go against society's conventions.
- He is frequently left to fend for himself and is always somewhat of an outsider. Huck is still a youngster, though, and is influenced by others, especially by Tom, his creative buddy. Twain establishes right away in the book that Huck is a young man from the lowest strata of white society. Huck is distrustful of the world and the ideals it instills in him since he is cut off from the mass of civilization.
Thus, Huck Finn is thirteen years old.
Refer here to learn more about Huck Finn: brainly.com/question/27985475
#SPJ4
Answer:
1.It is unrealistic to expect all countries to destroy their weapons.
Explanation:
the second choice is already invalid, nuclear weaponry has already been used before so it's argument is false, while choice A makes sense, especially when you include somewhere like China and Russia into the mix. Heck, even us in America!
Positive aspect of the Communism is, the creation of the social security for the populations, by the government providing the free health care and free education toward citizens, as we can see in the Communist countries.
Negative aspect of the Communism is the limitation toward citizens' economic freedom (as it was and currently practiced in a die-hard Communist countries), by making the State sector more involvement in the economy, and limiting private ownership. This could 'kill' the citizens' economic activity and economic innovations, and the economy would be inefficiently managed.
So the conclusion is, Communism brought a better living for the ordinary citizens, but killing the economic freedom on its citizens (as it was and currently practiced in a die-hard Communist countries).