<u>Original Question</u><u><em>: What is the significance of the Interstate Commerce Act of 1887?</em></u>
<u></u>
<u>Answer: Choice (B)</u> or <u>The act established some of the first steps to allow congress to regulate interstate trade</u>
<u></u>
<u></u>
<em>Reason:</em>
- <em>Choice (A) is incorrect because these laws were set up to regulate industries, not to ban certain monopolies</em>
- <em>Choice (B) is correct because it was the first attempt by the government to implement rules to prevent railroads from setting up outlandish prices</em>
- <em>Choice (C) is incorrect because this act didn't have any relation with the Apache Indians</em>
- <em>Choice (D) is incorrect because this wasn't the first time that the US set up a law that influenced the economy</em>
<em />
Hope that helps!
Answer:
Democratic-Republicans were deeply committed to the principles of republicanism, which they feared were threatened by the supposed aristocratic tendencies of the Federalists. the party strongly opposed Federalist programs, one of the Federalist programs included the national bank.
Explanation:
Religious freedom for all is mine. it's right on my test
Truman was the one who adopted a policy of containment. This (arguably) aggressive approach was what influenced America to get into wars such as the Korean War and other smaller conflicts. Meanwhile, Eisenhower was a bit less aggressive. Although his Secretary of State Dulles preached Brinksmanship and was very anti-Soviet, Eisenhower himself was somewhat against this, as shown when he did nothing to prevent the Hungarian Revolt. He also sought to increase U.S-Soviet Relations in the Spirit of Geneva, but the U-2 Incident pretty much erased most of his progress.
Answer:
D.
Explanation: The population in the middle colonies was more diverse.
