Answer: One major difference is that King's believes that slavery didn't play a role, while Burns' does. A historical event that could support King's is when Congress established the Freedmen's Bureau in 1865. This provided aid to African Americans in their transition from slavery to freedom. A historical event that could support Burns' is Dred Scott v. Sandford. The case in 1857 declared that slaves and blacks descended from slaves and were not American citizens and cannot sue, so this could have led to outrage and war.
Answer:Chinggis Khan
From the 6th to the 13th century it grew into a city more populous than it is today, changing hands every couple of centuries – Western Turks, Arabs, Persian Samanids, Karakhanids, Seljuq Turks, Mongolian Karakitay and Khorezmshah have all ruled here – before being obliterated by Chinggis Khan in 1220.
Explanation:
Answer: Baffled can mean that the soilders were in shock over what they had seen.
Explanation:
Answer: True
Explanation: While a southern slaveowner himself, Taylor believed that slavery was economically infeasible in the Mexican Cession, and as such he opposed slavery in those territories as a needless source of controversy. His major goal was sectional peace, preserving the Union through legislative compromise.
<span>The region that the Franks invaded after crossing the Rhine River is D. Gaul. This is because neither of the other countries existed, per se. During the ancient, Gaul was the territory that included today's France, Luxembourg, Belgium, Switzerland, Northern Italy, but also parts of the Netherlands and Germany, so obviously that is the correct answer. The Franks were, after all, one of the first Germanic tribes that settled in these areas.</span>
