Answer:
I think they whould all agree that lying is wrong.
Explanation:
I think they would think this because what they do is tell the truth about the world and differnt things. Not lie about them.
Answer:
Contains full text of the U.S. Constitution, historical notes, and annotations of cases decided by the U.S. Supreme Court. Prepared by Library of Congress, Congressional Research Services.
The answer is<u> "structural plasticity".</u>
Brain plasticity, otherwise called neuroplasticity, is a term that alludes to the mind's capacity to change and adjust because of experience. At the point when individuals say that the mind has pliancy, they are not recommending that the cerebrum is like plastic. Neuro alludes to neurons, the nerve cells that are the building squares of the mind and sensory system, and pliancy alludes to the cerebrum's pliability.
There are two kinds of neuroplasticity, including:
Functional plasticity: The brain's capacity to move capacities from a harmed territory of the mind to other intact regions.
Structural plasticity: The brain's capacity to really change its physical structure because of learning.
The committee of correspondence was initiated by Samuel Adams
Answer:
True
Explanation:
In the Daubert case, The case is tainted because the defendant provided 'expert witness' to give testimony in the favor, but the testimonies that given contradict the common scientific knowledge that is held by scientific community. Even though this happen, the juries still rule in favor of the defendant simply because they brought 'an expert'.
To prevent this from happening again, the supreme court created rule 702 which restrict the type of expert testimonies that are admissible in court.
