Answer: Arguing from causation
Explanation:
Arguing from causation is an arguement which has a casual statement concluding it. Laura argues from causation.
<span>One of the important things that make information published in scientific journals trustworthy is because these journals are usually peer-reviewed.
</span><span>
By definition, peer review is the process of subjecting the </span>scholarly work, ideas or research of<span> an author to the scrutiny of others who are experts in the same field.</span>
It would most likely mean that it is a really serious case
Hope these helped :)
Answer: Cue
Explanation:
Cue is a thing said or done that serves as a signal to an actor or other performer
So, Certain key words that signal a reason is being offered in support of a conclusion or that a conclusion is being asserted are known as Cue.