After the successful revolution in the Latin American countries, instead of democracies as the people wanted, the countries became mostly communist and dictatorships. While in some countries that communism was embraced by the people, and in the case of Cuba it worked out relatively well, it was not the case for most of the other countries. The other nations were stuck with dictators that tried to control every aspect of the country and society, and they did it in a very bad manner, usually using violence. That was not seen fondly by the people, so there were lot of conflicts, which eventually led to the overthrow of most of these leaders, and finally became democracies, at least on paper.
We won’t be able to stand for what we know is right, we won’t have freedom to do what we want, and people with the authority will control our future.
The rebellion was named after one<span> of the Ottawa leaders. ... He argued that </span>Britain had<span> no right to force</span>laws<span> on the </span>colonies<span> because the </span>colonists had<span> no representatives in the </span>British<span> Parliament. ... "</span>Letters<span>from a farmer in PA," a widely </span>read<span> series of </span>letters<span> protesting the act, </span>were<span> published in </span>colonial<span>newspapers.</span>
Explanation:
The fall of the Western Roman Empire was the process of decline in the Western Roman Empire in which the Empire failed to enforce its rule
I would say the KKK defines “pure patriotism by the mere fact that they feel they are superiority back how it was in patriotic benjamin franklin days. White men were the most superior and they always will be in america. since they “started” this country, the fact that monitory or people of color are trying to step in and do there share, it’s installs fear that the hard work of their “ancestors” isn’t getting credited for. i would say this is the most “appropriate” and vague answer. i hope this helps ! :D
