Answer:
OC. A group of people with a shared culture and language who live in a
Explanation:
The complete statement is "The emotional connotation of the underlined word helps king emphasize the document’s significance" Option B. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is a
document?</h3>
Generally, a document is simply defined as that serves as a source of data or proof or as a record of official business.
In conclusion, In order to stress the document's relevance, King uses the emotional connotation of the underlined term.
Read more about document
brainly.com/question/27396650
#SPJ4
At the Battle of Gettysburg, It was a crushing blow to rebel morale. Their nearly undefeated hero, general Lee, had been defeated. Of course, it was a huge morale boost for the Union, who had been grumbling about the war in the East because of the invincible Lee. In addition, after the Battle of Gettysburg, two great speeches were given, one by the president himself. He showed how the Union needed to keep fighting this war to keep the greatest nation from leaving the earth and so that the country could truly be one where all men (or people) could be equal. At Vicksburg, it was more of a military advantage. In addition to being a highly defensible location to put things of high importance in, it also completed the final piece of the Mississippi River. With the Union controlling all of the river, the Union could split the enemy in 2. This completed part of the Anaconda Plan.The Union could also use the river as a platform for transportation of troops, supplies, and as an artillery platform with their new ironclads. I think that the Battle of Gettysburg would have been more important. There was already low morale in the Union army. They were asking thrmselves why they were fighting a war to get people back into out country that didn't want to be here. Already, nearly 200 thousand casualties had taken place. They thought this was far too much to end slavery. If Lee had not finally been defeated, Vicksburg would never have happened, and the outcome of the civil war could have been very different.
Answer: Yes. The support of non-Native Alaskans was an important factor which lead to the settlement of Alaska Native land claims. It is consistent with the evidence presented in this learning block.
Explaination:
The non-Natives Alaskans knew how the Natives Alaskans were dealt with in the Southeastern United States. They learnt from their mistakes so took a different approach when dealing with the natives from Alaska. The U.S. Courts were more sympathetic towards the natives due to past history. The federal government was in favor to help the native which was not so in the past.
