I would say that there aren't really any absolute standards for truth and justice. The reason for this is that considering we're only one species that has evolved out of apes, it is really hard to say whether the way we perceive reality and discover things through science can be thought as an absolute standard for truth. From this perspective it's even harder to find an absolute standard for justice.
Answer:
By seeking the participation and consent of the governed
Explanation:
According to Enlightenment thinkers, such as John Locke, Charles Montesquieu, Thomas Hobbes, etc, what would be the best way for a government to maintain legitimacy is "by seeking the participation and consent of the governed."
In other words, they all express the needs of different forms of democracy. These types of democracy will make common people or citizens' wish to be represented during decision making. It will also guide against possible civil revolution or massive protest
Answer:
1
Explanation:
the internet!
just kidding I learned this
Office of budget management and the general accounting office
Answer:
Archeologists may uncover new climate evidence.
Explanation:
Firstly, the archeologists are the professionals who specialize in the interpretation or analysis of the culture, material things, or tools humans have used in the past to convey human history, by assessing patterns in their findings.
Hence, the perfect example of a reason why historical interpretations may change over time is that "Archeologists may uncover new climate evidence."