Answer:
The container analogy is too static.
Explanation:
The WM or the Working memory may be defined as a cognitive system with some limited capacity which can hold information for a short period of time or temporarily. Working memory is very important for reasoning and also the guidance of the decision-making as well as behavior.
In the cognitive system, the recent effect is always associated with the working memory.
Working memory is always associated with the storage container which can store memories for short time. But this analogy is very much static as the working memory can more capable than simply the short term storage.
The power to recognize foreign nations is best categorized as part of the role of head diplomat, although lots of this responsibility falls to the Secretary of State.
The Boll Weevil was an insect that destroyed crops in Alabama in Georgia. The reason they were effect at different times is because they had different crops and the Boll Weevil migrated at different times.
Hello. You forgot to enter the answer options. The options are:
"United States v O'Brein, United States v. Eichman, Korematsu v. United States, Abrams et al. v. United States"
Answer:
Korematsu v. United States
Explanation:
The opinion shown above was issued in the Korematsu v. United States.
Korematsu v. United States was a case related to defending the petition that excluded Japanese-American citizens from the military area of the west coast during the Second World War. This occurred after the attack on Pearl Habor organized by American troops, causing a great loss to the USA and leaving the Japanese and descendants as unwanted people and enemies of the USA.
As a result, the government ordered all Japanese and Japanese descendants to leave their homes and move into internment camps (similar to concentration camps), which were places with no structure and resources necessary for the survival of these people. Because of this inhospitable environment Fred Korematsu, a descendant of Japanese, refused to go to the internment camps and claimed that this was a violation of the Fifth Amendment, that is, it was illegal. Thus began the case Korematsu v. United States.
