Answer: Choice B
There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.
========================================================
Explanation:
The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)
This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09
The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09
Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.
Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.
The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.
The first answer in the choices
The difference between them is 10
-4 - 6 = -10, however since it is only asking for the <em>difference, </em>your answer would be 10.
Answer:
gradient=change in y/change in x
=y2-y1/x2-x1
=-8-(-16)/-10-(-8)
=8/-2
=-4
1.9+2.2= 4.1
1.9•2.2= 4.18
4.18-4.1= .08
