Answer
#1. A reduction in habitat for arctic seals will reduce the population of arctic seals. This will reduce the capture efficiency for killer whales preying on arctic seals because there will be fewer to capture. A reduction in habitat for arctic seals will lower the carrying capacity for arctic seals because there is less habitat. A reduction in arctic seals, the food for killer whales, will reduce the carrying capacity for killer whales, unless there is a substitute source of food.
#2. If there is another source of food for killer whales, the population of killer whales will probably remain the same, if they were at their carrying capacity and their habitat remains the same. If there is another source of food for killer whales, the population of arctic seals will still decrease, because the habitat for arctic seals has decreased, and habitat is independent of predator population.
#3. There are many limitations on any simulation. The computer only uses the parameters in the program, so changes in ocean temperature, weather patterns, salinity changes, food supply, habitat, interaction with other species and presence of plants and zooplankton are not considered. All of those can change and change the results.
Explanation:
I am a man of god
Predator is what hunts and prey is what is hunted! May I get brainiac
<span>Only a single amino acid could change, because the reading frame is unaffected</span>
The answer is C ; Refinement
I'm sort of confused, the correct answer should be that 75% would be homozygous dominate and 25% heterozygous dominate and 0% would be anything recessive. I couldn't tell if that was an option because they were all smooshed together. I hope that helped
