1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ad libitum [116K]
3 years ago
15

(I NEED THIS ANSWERED QUICKLY! I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST AND EXTRA-EXTRA POINTS TO THE FIRST PERSON WHO ANSWERS THIS CORRECTLY!)

History
1 answer:
Anuta_ua [19.1K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: B

Explanation:

I definitely don’t think they would kill thousand of people just to hide the fact the they were having problems with the natives. The answer is B.

You might be interested in
In order to overcome his greatest obstacle to implementing his New Deal reform measures, President Franklin D. Roosevelt attempt
denpristay [2]

Answer:

increase the size of the Supreme Court so that he could appoint justices who would supply rulings favorable to him

Explanation:

The US Supreme Court first provoked public protests when, in May 1935, during an unprecedented economic crisis, the NIRA (National Industrial Recovery Act), which entered into force on June 16, 1933, was declared unconstitutional. This act became part of the New Deal of Roosevelt to save the country. Like other laws initiated by Roosevelt and adopted during the first “100 days,” the NIRA was extraordinary, well thought out and had one goal - to prevent huge social shocks that could cause an economic crisis at any moment. It was no accident that he was enthusiastically perceived by both businessmen and ordinary workers and employees of America.

However, the laws of the “New Deal” were literally passed in the 'fire order,' with the procedure for adoption curtailed, so the judges of the Armed Forces had arguments to declare them incompatible with the US Constitution. In January 1936, the Supreme Court’s decision abolished the AAA (Agricultural Adjustment Act) system, which was designed to save and restore the country's agriculture - imposing a tax on firms processing agricultural products, which, according to the judges of the Supreme Court, was contrary to the constitution.

In total, from January 1935 to May 1936, the US Supreme Court declared 11 laws that were passed by Congress in 1933-1934 as unconstitutional. The most important changes introduced by the New Deal in the life of American society were threatened, which caused widespread discontent among the population. The actions of the Supreme Court were opposed by the organized labor movement of America. The "revolutionary situation" began to ripen in the country. The presidential election in 1936 was a kind of referendum in favor of the “New Deal” by Roosevelt, turning the Supreme Court into an object of sharp criticism from the indignant public. Under these conditions, on February 5, 1937, Roosevelt sent a message to Congress on the plan of reform of the Supreme Court, which provided for a significant expansion of its composition. Although Congress did not accept the draft, it became apparent that the Supreme Court could no longer remain in its original position. Soon, the judges of the Supreme Court recognized the National Act on Labor Relations as constitutional. In May 1937, the Constitutional Law on Social Insurance was also successfully tested for constitutionality, and in 1939, also the Law on the Regulation of Agriculture of 1938. In essence, under pressure from the public, a legal 'amnesty' for the New Deal's socio-economic reforms took place.

3 0
3 years ago
Why did the British plan to seize control of Albany New York in 1777 ?
alex41 [277]
I shut off the harbors that were bringing in supplies and it's a political battle too because if you take the biggest city then you strike more fear and often win.
4 0
2 years ago
What was the cause???
Jobisdone [24]

Answer: A

Explanation: I’m not sure I’m right

6 0
3 years ago
Vận động là hình thức tồn tại và là thuộc tính cố hữu của vật chất. Anh/ (chị) hiểu như thế nào về nguyên lý này? Nêu ý nghĩa củ
11111nata11111 [884]

Answer:

ybuhguhg5htf5hyf5c4crcn7i

3 0
2 years ago
How did the rights of dalits, or lower-caste Indians, change in democratic India?
krek1111 [17]

The democratized India has forever banned the use of the caste system used by members of the Hindu religion. When the system was allowed, the Dalits were marginalized, had no rights guaranteed and could only perform works related to feces of the people of higher castes .With the end of the caste system, the Dalits should be considered ordinary citizens with equal rights and duties to the rest of the population.

The creation of the Atrocities Prevention Act in 1995 protected the Dalits from discriminating against superior castes. Anyone who disobeys this law would be automatically arrested without bail.


7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • On the map above, what does the red line represent?
    13·1 answer
  • Which describes the connection between the U.S. Constitution and the Patriot Act?
    5·1 answer
  • The reform act of 1832 8n great britain gave the right to vote to:
    11·1 answer
  • How did a market economy affect American life?
    7·2 answers
  • Did Vanzetti believe that judge Thayer had been fair
    9·1 answer
  • What is the difference between forms and systems of government
    10·1 answer
  • Major Accomplishments of Alice Walker?
    8·1 answer
  • Congressional senators represent more citizens than the individual congresspersons from the same state.
    14·1 answer
  • Type the correct answer in the box. Spell all words correctly.
    7·2 answers
  • 4. Suppose the trend in overall global temperatures shown above
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!