Answer:
can i see the passage please
Explanation:
The perfect tense means it has been acomplished so
future is in the future so
will have fallen
Answer:
He showed her his riches
Explanation:
But he never really got with daisy tom was always controlling her
There are multiple ways of comparing and contrasting structures that each have different implications and dangers.
1. The back-and-forth method, in which every other sentence compares and contrasts. ie:
P1- theme
-p1 Book A is blah, whereas Book B is blah.
P2- theme
-p2 Book A is blah.... you get the point,
The danger of this method is sounding too redundant, although it does a good job of focusing on the themes.
2. The separate, mixed theme method, in which an entire paragraph is dedicated to each subject, but the themes are thus mixed up within those paragraphs. This method is less redundant but runs the risk of losing clarity of theme.
3. The compare vs. contrast method. This one is fairly straightforward: A paragraph comparing, a paragraph contrasting, and one of synthesis at the end. The pros: It's playing it safe, and it'll work. The cons: It's boring.
Combinations of these 3 methods work as well, it all depends on your personal writing style and the subjects you're comparing.
Good luck
The thing which a government does when it vows to achieve disarmament is to:
- Be accountable
- Show the destruction of weapons to the world
- SIgn peace treaties.
<h3>Disarmament</h3>
This refers to the situation where a country decides to reduce, limit or eradicate its military weapons, usually nuclear weapons.
With this in mind, when a government says that it wants to achieve disarmament, then it would have to go through the process of disarmament which has to be transparent and open to all and also a legal contract would be signed.
Read more about disarmament here:
brainly.com/question/6595101
