Answer:
Terminal point (0, -1); sin Ø = -1 ⇒ A
Step-by-step explanation:
In the unit circle, Ф is the angle between the terminal side and the positive part of the x-xis
- The terminal point on the positive part of the x-axis is (1, 0),which means Ф = 0° or 360° and cosФ = 1, sinФ = 0
- The terminal point on the positive part of the y-axis is (0, 1),which means Ф = 90° and cosФ = 0, sinФ = 1
- The terminal point on the negative part of the x-axis is (-1, 0),which means Ф = 180° and cosФ = -1, sinФ = 0
- The terminal point on the negative part of the y-axis is (0, -1),which means Ф = 270° and cosФ = 0, sinФ = -1
In a unit circle
∵ Ф = 270°
→ By using the 4th rule above
∴ The terminal point is (0, -1)
∴ sinФ = -1
∴ Terminal point (0, -1); sin Ø = -1
<u>Answer:</u>
Trapezoid is the shape of the cross section of a rectangular pyramid.
<u>Step-by-step explanation:</u>
We are given a rectangular pyramid was sliced such that it becomes parallel to its base. We are to determine the shape of the cross section.
Slicing the pyramid with rectangular pyramid will form a trapezoid as a cross section which will be parallel to the base of the pyramid.
Refer to the figure below for better understanding.
Step-by-step explanation:
Bunker Hill was the name of the battle!
<-------------.-------------->
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Answer:
See explanation below.
Step-by-step explanation:
The prime numbers are bold:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
a) We can see that as we go higher, twin primes seem less frequent but even considering that, there is an infinite number of twin primes. If you go high enough you will still eventually find a prime that is separated from the next prime number by just one composite number.
b) I think it's interesting the amount of time that has been devoted to prove this conjecture and the amount of mathematicians who have been involved in this. One of the most interesting facts was that in 2004 a purported proof (by R. F. Arenstorf) of the conjecture was published but a serious error was found on it so the conjecture remains open.
