<span>The fact that Denise exhibits episodes of anger and self-destructive behaviors at work, means that Denise's behaviorial pattern is part of the </span>borderline personality disorder. It is a mental illness that is characterized with <span>emotional instability, </span>varying moods, self-image, behavior and <span>unstable relationships.
</span><span>It usually begins during adolescence or early adulthood</span>
Answer:
Personal injury claim
Explanation:
Because Sarah was injures in the store, she can claim personal injury based on the fact that the store failed its duty towards its customers. The duty of the store is to keep walkways clear of any kind of obstructions that can cause potential harm to customers. Remodeling does not count as altered circumstances as the store was open to customers.
In order to receive a compensation, Sarah has to report the accident to the store management and make a compensation claim. The store can be liable for department store tripping accident compensation claim, for not removing any trip hazard.
The United States would not interfere in the internal affairs of or the wars between European powers; (2) the United States recognized and would not interfere with existing colonies and dependencies in the Western Hemisphere; (3) the Western Hemisphere was closed to future colonization; and (4) any attempt by a European power to oppress or control any nation in the Western Hemisphere would be viewed as a hostile act against the United States.
Answer:
The correct answer is a. Humphreys used license plate numbers to target their homes and interview the men without disclosing the real subject of his study.
Explanation:
Laud Humphreys (1930-1988) was a sociologist who for his PhD dissertation wrote a study called <em>Tearoom Trade</em> (1968), where he studied the behavior of males who engaged in homosexual sex in public toilets. Humphreys made a series of discoveries, like finding out that most of the men who engaged in these practices were not openly or overtly homosexual, and even a majority of them (54%) were married. However, his research was widely criticized because of how he performed it. Humphreys acted out as a sort of look-out for the men in the toilets, but without disclosing his identity as a researcher. Moreover, <u>Humphreys followed the unwitting subjects of his study to their homes by </u><u>tracking their license plate numbers and interviewed them</u><u>, posing as a government health officer and hiding his true identity as a sociologist conducting research</u>. Lying to subjects and hiding from them that they're part of a study is frowned upon by the scientific community, so the research was widely controversial, and it's still brought up as an example of the ethics of social research.
