3 years ago

Please explain in full detail. What mistake did "Lou" make? Thank you.

Mathematics

2 answers:

insens350 [35]3 years ago

7 0

Lou didn't break the sections correctly or evenly. You wouldn't be able to do 6 times 3 since the full length isn't 3.

Marta_Voda [28]3 years ago

5 0

Lou didn't break the sects up so he got the answer wrong. This is the correct method.....

Sect #1
6 - 3 = 3
3 x 3 = 9

Sect #2
6 - 3 = 3
3 x 8 = 24

24 + 9 = 33

Sorry if i didn't explain good or got the answer right. Im young.

You might be interested in

Which of the following shows how -6 and -3 compare?

Sever21 [200]

-6 is father away from 0 than -3 is

this means that -3 is greater in value than -6

another way to write this is

-6 < -3

hope this helped

5 0

3 years ago

Last month, Lloyd's Systems analyzed the project whose cash flows are shown below. However, before the decision to accept or rej

Radda [10]

Answer:

C. $9.04

Step-by-step explanation:

The net present value of a cash flow C in year n at some interest rate r is given by ...

NPV = C·(1 +r)^(-n)

Adding the values of the different cash flows at the different interest rates, we get the results shown in the attached table. The NPV goes up by $9.04 when the cost of capital goes down.

_____

<em>Additional comment</em>

Neither WACC will cause this project to be rejected. If the WACC were to increase to 11.11%, then the project would have a zero return.