Answer:
Supply increase and demand decreases
The income elasticity of real money demand d. 3/4
Increase in real money demand = Increase in nominal money demand - Increase in inflation = 4% - 1% = 3%
Income elasticity of real money demand = % increase in real money demand / % increase in real income
= 3% / 4%
= 3/4
Income elasticity of demand is a monetary measure of how responsive the amount of demand for a very good or provider is to trade-in earnings. The formulation for calculating earnings elasticity of demand is the percentage change in quantity demanded divided by using the percent change in earnings.
In economics, the profits elasticity of call for is the responsivenesses of the quantity demanded an amazing to an alternate in patron profits. It is measured because of the ratio of the share exchange in the amount demanded to the proportion exchange in profits.
If the earnings elasticity of call for is more than 1, the best or carrier is taken into consideration a luxury and profits elastic. An amazing provider that has an earnings elasticity of call for between zero and 1 is considered an ordinary correct and income inelastic.
Learn more about Income elasticity here: brainly.com/question/15899715
#SPJ4
The answer is $6200.00
Based on https://taxfoundation.org/2014-tax-brackets/
The standard deduction single based on the source is $6200. Tax exemptions for singles are up to $52,800. The threshold on this tax is an annual salary of $254,200. Higher salaries would have higher tax deductions. Once a single tax holder enters $376,700 the person would no longer be included for higher exemption because of the gross compensation increase.
An effective team would never have Unclear definitions of goals.
Option C is correct answer.
Unclear definitions of goals :
Unclear goals are part of the communication problem that continues to plague many workplaces, and were also cited as the number one cause of stress for tech workers in an earlier Comparably study. Employees who don't know what's expected of them can't perform their best work.
What happens when goals are unclear?
A lack of direction and unclear goals are among the largest reasons why projects fail. While it may be impossible to predict every outcome, taking time early on to define and communicate objectives and goals can radically increase the chance your team successfully completes a project.
Learn more about Unclear definitions of goals :
brainly.com/question/11399548
#SPJ4
1) Town of Bayport:
We have that the residents value the fireworks at
a total of 50+100+300=450$. That is the utility they gain. But they
would also have to pay 360$ for the fireworks. The total outcome is
450$+(-360$)=90$. Hence, the outcome is positive and the fireworks pass
the cost benefit analysis.
If the fireworks' cost is to be split
equally, we have that each of the 3 residents has to pay 360/3=120$. Let
us now do the cost-benefit analysis for everyone.
Jacques stands to gain 50$ from the fireworks but would have to pay 120$. He will vote against it.
Also, Kyoko will gain 100$ but would have to pay 120$. He will lose utility/money from this so he will vote against.
Musashi on the other hand, would gain 300$ and only pay 120$. He is largely benefitted by this measure. Only he would
We have that 2 out of the 3 would vote against the fireworks, so that the fireworks will not be bought. The vote does not yield the same answer as the benefit-cost analysis.
2) Town of River Heights:
We have that the total value of the fireworks to the community
is 20+140+160=320$. The total value of the fireworks is lower than
their cost so their cost benefit analysis yields that they should not be
bought.
However, let's see what each resident says. The cost to each resident is 360/3=120$. Rina is against the fireworks since she will only gain 20$. Sean and Yvette are for the fireworks since they gain 140$ and 160$ respectively, which are larger than the cost of the fireworks to each of them (120$). Hence, 2 will vote for the fireworks and one will vote against and fireworks will be bought.
Again, the vote clashes with the cost-benefit analysis.
3) The first choice is wrong. It is very difficult for a government to provide the exact types of public goods that everyone wants because that would be too costly; one cannot have a public good that everyone pays for so that only a couple of people enjoy it. In our example, we saw that in every case, a public good and its production would have sime supporters and some adversaries.
Majority rule is not always the most efficient way to decide public goods; as we have seen in the second case, the cost-benefit analysis yields that the fireworks are not worth it but they are approved by the majority nonetheless.
The final sentence is correct. The differing preferences of the people make a clearcut choice impossible and the government has to take into account various tradeoffs and compromises in order to determine which public goods to provide.
