The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
Do the economic benefits of free trade outweigh the social costs?
Not really, and it all depends on the perspective.
From the big companies and industrial side, free trade has been a success. Free trade has allowed thousands of companies to export their goods with cero import tariffs, benefiting the income. It has allowed multinational companies to go abroad and establishing branches in different parts of the world, basically in underdeveloped nations.
Once there, they paid very low salaries, much less than what they should have paid in their former countries, That is a reason why they moved to underdeveloped countries. So cheap labor is one reason. And other these multinational companies freely exploit the many raw materials and natural resources of that underdeveloped country.
Meanwhile, free trade makes rich people and corporations richer, and poor countries and poor people continue to be as poor as they have always been. No serious progress at all,
<span>The reliability procedure that involves correlation of partial scores from one administration of one test is: Split half
Partial scores measure the degree of association between two variable. Since it came from two different variables, the reliability of this procedure is also split into two.</span>
Because of the fertile soil and the amount of wheat they produced
The Huns were a wandering tribe notable in the 4th and 5th century CE whose origin is unexplored but, likely they came from someplace within the eastern edge of the Altai Mountains and the Caspian Sea, roughly modern Kazakhstan.
Ammianus Marcellinus, a retired Roman soldier, addressed his descriptions of the Huns longer than a decade after 376, the time when the events he relates took place. His description contains the prejudices of a Romans toward tribes who is supposed to be inferior beings or barbarians
According to Ammianus, the Huns grow up without brushes and without any appeal. They all have closely knit and powerful limbs and round necks. Moreover, they are of the big size, and low legged or of the husky patterns which are slashed out in a violent manner.
Answer:
The correct answer is - C) military force.
The protests for democratic reformation of China in the Tiananmen square where not seen fondly by the Chinese government. They decided to use military force in order to destroy the protest, and it was not just to move the people away or scare them off, but it was very brutal. Lot of people that were protesting were actually killed the by the military, and that was supposed to serve as an example for any other people in the country that would try and do something like that.
The protest was dominated by young people, students in general, and unfortunately, their will for better and free life meant death for lot of them.
Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/3817823#readmore
Explanation:
